Message from @True
Discord ID: 786054293191000064
I dont watch CNN, are they covering the legal challenges at all?
The people trump represents should not be ruling the country. Complaining about no existent fraud is not good
So one of the issues people get wrong about the general hate for republican politicians like Trump is that democrats don't hate him, they hate the people they represent. That's why they hated Regan and Bush with the same fervour.
This might sound bad but perhaps most should not be able to vote
Just saying
Yeah, that does sound bad
Last I heard they were reporting they were unfounded and frivolous
@james j I think that the numbers when you do a monte carlo simulation and other fraud checks that something happened with the numbers in the swing states. Whether it was legal fraud or not is still getting played out in the courts. But the statistical anomalies are quite large.
The statistical models are all dependent on subjective inputs. You could use their same model to show the GOP cheated. @Skoochie
What is legal fraud
True you could do that, but you would only show it on one axis of analysis, that's why you do several tests. That's why it's concerning is that multiple tests are showing fraud.
Credit default swaps
Legal fraud/legal cheating is like changing the rules to benefit your side like mail in ballots benefit democrats is an example
Bundling of junk mortgage-backed securities
@Phil, you just advanced to level 1!
I've seen several models so I'm not sure which one you're referring to, but can you link it?
@Skoochie the models presented in the hearings were the shiva model which is bunk. What other models are you talking about? Or benfords law which can indicate fraud but does little to prove fraud especially in a election. As stated by benford himself
Wouldn't legal fraud be what Trump is doing by collecting funds for his election defense fund where unless you donate over $8,000 it only goes to DJT and RNC
I wouldn't hang my hat on any research data, as your financial backer seeks so shall you find
No benfords said you needed data of magnitudes which this election has, but most elections dont
If you know what's good for your funding
I hear good things about baynard. Although you have to accept his inputs as factual and I believe the FBI was looking into him @Skoochie
This is more about impropriety than fraud.
@james j a case like that would take the FBI years to get to the bottom of if there is anything there or not
@Skoochie https://youtu.be/etx0k1nLn78 this guy explains it well
Oh no I'm not saying "the numbers say so that's it" it just means we have to look at video and the machines
@Skoochie, you just advanced to level 2!
There's no way to definitively find it either
I'm not talking to you man
I've seen that one with the "trump tower"
I'm talking to your adversary
I like the Stand-up Maths channel
@True, you just advanced to level 5!
That's basically it
You're starting to take on the demeanor of an alien supervillain