Message from @Beth
Discord ID: 787344913091526677
empty ... he's just saying they will "kill" the investigation which is true
Negative on any sleep sir
..."Liberals should have abandoned the Democratic Party when Bill Clinton and political hacks such as Biden transformed the Democratic Party into the Republican Party..."
Hunter Biden Called His Father and Chinese Business Partner ‘Office Mates’ in September 2017 Email
fucking wow
All politician and actors in this conspiracy should be held accountable, you have a problem with this statement?
Discord is pitiful when compared to YouTube. I never dreamed the "establishment" could pull the rug out from under the people. Does R&R Law have a video on "discord" because I can't find crap?
No disagreement on ALL...
I read of ulterior motive for the state of emergency?
Or was this a different emergency. It’s too early for me.
You believe that the power structure will de-legitimize its own framework?
Highly unlikely.
Would you like someone to call you a grassroots agitator and vigorous proponent of revolution in all forms?
Think it’s old. I hope it is anyway.
You know me 👀
I hope so..can’t take anymore emergencies 🤯
Me too. Plus Yemen is in a bad way.
Siege warfare is good for business.
The future is never looked brighter for defense contractors and their equity holders.
We are in a civil war now. Mostly informational and propaganda with a few antifa/blm hot spots. They beg the hot civil war so as to blame the right and the 2nd.
😎
Everyone needs to chill out but I don’t see it happening anytime soon👀
We need the aliens 👽
The first casualty of war is always the truth, with that the wars have been a foot for some time.
Aliens are currently throwing rocks at us.. Thinking “Calm down, idiots”
When you take the freedoms and rights away from POTUS. What hope is there for us to keep those same freedoms and rights?
You think this is all ok?
No
ASYMMETRIC WARFARE:THE ONLY THING NEW IS THE TACTIC
https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a433588.pdf
You used the term warfare. Careful, you’ll get called names
Mark Esper (who I like) & what the military did (defying the orders of the commander in chief) was wrong on so many levels.
To be clear I'm not advocating for war, I'm providing information.
I guess now we have to add that statement to everything we say
Then I guess we’d better copy and paste it because we both chat a lot
@Beth In The Art Of War, Sun Tzu states that, “what is of supreme importance in
war is to attack the enemy’s strategy.”
His focus was not purely on defeating the enemy army, but on defeating the enemy’s plan. Defeating the enemy’s army was of lower precedence than disrupting his alliances that were key to his plan. Clearly Sun Tzu appreciated the need to weaken an adversary through
many approaches designed to affect his ability and willingness to wage war. He
does not advocate a symmetric approach to war where one attacks an
adversary’s army with an equal force, but he advocates a strategy that employs
the cheng (orthodox) force and the ch’I (unorthodox) force. Sun Tzu dedicates
an entire section of his work to “Weaknesses and Strengths”. “To be certain to
take what you attack is to attack a place the enemy does not protect. To be
certain to hold what you defend is to defend a place the enemy does not attack.”8
He frequently refers to knowing your enemy and yourself and to shaping the
enemy while avoiding allowing him to shape you. This is very similar to dominant
battlespace awareness as articulated in Joint Vision 2010 and other joint
publications. Sun Tzu refers to direct and indirect approaches to warfare.
Indirect approaches are asymmetric. It is the ability to adapt to an adversary’s
tactics and doctrine by either developing new tactics and doctrine of your own or
by employing new technology in such a way as to overcome an adversaries
strength. “Thus, one able to gain the victory by modifying his tactics in
