And they did

No there isn’t. There are accusations of fraud not proof @BoxyPunkChick

Michael Farris, constitutional lawyer:

"I am deeply disappointed in tonight’s Supreme Court decision to dismiss Texas’s lawsuit against the four states.

It was dismissed on the sole ground that one state has no standing to complain about unconstitutional actions by officials in other states vis-a-vis presidential elections.

This is directly contradicted by this statement by the Supreme Court in 1983 (Anderson v. Celebrezze):

“Furthermore, in the context of a Presidential election, state-imposed restrictions implicate a uniquely important national interest. For the President and the Vice President of the United States are the only elected officials who represent all the voters in the Nation. Moreover, the impact of the votes cast in each State is affected by the votes cast for the various candidates in other States.”

The legal theory on the merits was clear and correct. Only legislators and not courts and not election officials can change the laws for elections.

There were over 300 lawsuits filed by the left in 2020 to ease ballot security restrictions. They didn’t do this to practice their litigation skills.

We have to organize a significant counter effort to absolutely ensure the integrity of the election process.
This can never happen again.

(I apologize in advance. I cannot answer every question being asked in the thread. I don’t have detailed plans for next steps but be guaranteed that I am going to make a serious effort to do so. Stay tuned.)"

@james j there is proof.

They didn’t , you could posit they violated the state constitution but that’s up their Supreme Court to decide

He has argued cases in front of SCOTUS

No there isn’t @BoxyPunkChick

The Georgia video? There are some higher resolution versions of it. Contrary to “fact”-checkers, those were suitcases taken out from under the table, with pristine ballots (no folds on any of them, as expected in mail-in ballots, scanned after GOP watchers went home (in violation of Georgia law), and ballots being scanned multiple times

That guy is a international lawyer not a constitutional lawyer @AOH_Assassin

Just like fraud claiming you are doesn’t make it true

Jenna Ellis claims to be election lawyer

I don’t claim it, it’s on video. Lol.

She has no experience

@AOH_Assassin he does

The fraud is on video.

No there ain’t any fraud on video.

oh cmon theres never fraud if democraps do it

https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud

And when it doesn’t exist

It’s on Wikipedia lol

Everywhere you check, he is a constitutional lawyer

That’s over the span of like 20 years even if combined wouldn’t effect the outcome of the election. @BoxyPunkChick

they will scream fraud and election interference or try to impeach over lies for years, if their stooge wins fraud doesnt exist

We have video. Your links hold no weight lol

it doesnt exist->its not widespread->its not enough to change the outcome

You have to call a spade a spade

You don’t need widespread fraud to change an outcome lol

ignorance is bliss

That spade was called to not be fraud @AOH_Assassin

That is yes, but you cannot say that there isn't here. You want to dismiss the video evidence? Or the "white unfolded" ballots. How about the signatures that didn't match during the investigation???

In this election you would @AOH_Assassin so far nothing

So he claims , look at his education @AOH_Assassin

patrick henry college, they never study the constitution cmon

ANY FRAUD should be investigated

Absentee ballots without folds? Loool. Come on, dude. Explain that

State frauds should be dealt with

The poll manager of 20 years even said she has never seen absentee ballots in pristine condition, without folds

It’s clear as day.