Message from @AOH_Assassin
Discord ID: 787516134664306708
antifa are literally hiding behind the police
i thought they hated the police
They do until they need them
SCOTUS ruling sucks donkey dick
@AOH_Assassin how
I agree, it does. It leaves a lot of issues in the way of abuse for fraud. It also does prevent a state from suing another state for their rights too. I can see both sides, but it's troubling because of how they worded it.
It directly contradicts SCOTUS precedent on state standing for elections.
States run elections
Right but there is proof of fraudulent votes.
Only citizens in the state can sue
Yeah, but they cannot violate the US constitution.
Exactly
And they did
No there isn’t. There are accusations of fraud not proof @BoxyPunkChick
Michael Farris, constitutional lawyer:
"I am deeply disappointed in tonight’s Supreme Court decision to dismiss Texas’s lawsuit against the four states.
It was dismissed on the sole ground that one state has no standing to complain about unconstitutional actions by officials in other states vis-a-vis presidential elections.
This is directly contradicted by this statement by the Supreme Court in 1983 (Anderson v. Celebrezze):
“Furthermore, in the context of a Presidential election, state-imposed restrictions implicate a uniquely important national interest. For the President and the Vice President of the United States are the only elected officials who represent all the voters in the Nation. Moreover, the impact of the votes cast in each State is affected by the votes cast for the various candidates in other States.”
The legal theory on the merits was clear and correct. Only legislators and not courts and not election officials can change the laws for elections.
There were over 300 lawsuits filed by the left in 2020 to ease ballot security restrictions. They didn’t do this to practice their litigation skills.
We have to organize a significant counter effort to absolutely ensure the integrity of the election process.
This can never happen again.
(I apologize in advance. I cannot answer every question being asked in the thread. I don’t have detailed plans for next steps but be guaranteed that I am going to make a serious effort to do so. Stay tuned.)"
@james j there is proof.
They didn’t , you could posit they violated the state constitution but that’s up their Supreme Court to decide
He has argued cases in front of SCOTUS
No there isn’t @BoxyPunkChick
The Georgia video? There are some higher resolution versions of it. Contrary to “fact”-checkers, those were suitcases taken out from under the table, with pristine ballots (no folds on any of them, as expected in mail-in ballots, scanned after GOP watchers went home (in violation of Georgia law), and ballots being scanned multiple times
That guy is a international lawyer not a constitutional lawyer @AOH_Assassin
Just like fraud claiming you are doesn’t make it true
Jenna Ellis claims to be election lawyer
I don’t claim it, it’s on video. Lol.
She has no experience
@AOH_Assassin he does
The fraud is on video.
No there ain’t any fraud on video.
oh cmon theres never fraud if democraps do it
And when it doesn’t exist
It’s on Wikipedia lol
Everywhere you check, he is a constitutional lawyer
That’s over the span of like 20 years even if combined wouldn’t effect the outcome of the election. @BoxyPunkChick
they will scream fraud and election interference or try to impeach over lies for years, if their stooge wins fraud doesnt exist
We have video. Your links hold no weight lol
it doesnt exist->its not widespread->its not enough to change the outcome
You have to call a spade a spade
You don’t need widespread fraud to change an outcome lol