If they actually did a audit they would have something to show for it

Step 1. We think the machine is bad

Step 2. Repeat the same nonsense I have been saying for years with no new added information

Heres hoping the fbi find the data traffic transfer overseas on the solarwinds machines, and have the patriotism to state all what they find

This guy (previous interview) https://youtu.be/ficae6x1Q5A

Same guy same story , same bs artist

Hey, James know-it-all is awake. Hi James.

They claimed in the hearing that they captured packets that went from the machine to the Internet

What ever happened to that tall tale

Bye James.

@SoonMrWick I don’t sleep also how can you take that “report” seriously

It’s just a stated claim and then a rehashing of the same conclusion that guy had years ago. (Which btw is yet another claim with no evidence)

Sleep is good for the soul.

Good morning! 🌞 It’s still election month. It’s like ground hog day.

Election ended yesterday

Now it’s just ceremony

You didn't even watch the video of the guys platform you're on. Amazing.

I haven’t watched his videos for weeks

The election is over

https://github.com/fireeye/red_team_tool_countermeasures

Okay some more thoughts on this paper. Towards the bottom they compare their model with other models claiming, of course, that their model is better. Wait there are other models? Yes and what do those models say? Well they agree on the places where cheating didn't occur but disagree with the model in the paper on these places where cheating supposedly did occur according to the model in the paper. So this paper model is better because it found cheating. Well they don't say that. They claim their model is better because their model is built on the entire US and in the critique of another model they say this "These five states are not similar, they are idiosyncratic in some respect ..." referring to the five states their model predicts fraud. This is similar to what I said in previous comments. So while they apply this logic to criticize another that compares counties in these states to similar counties in other states, they themselves build this model based off of all counties, recognize these states are idiosyncratic nevertheless apply their model. Sorry can't have this both ways. What is a criticism of one model is even a bigger criticism of the model in this paper. They repeat something like this in their conclusion, saying that either AZ, GA, PA etc. are totally unlike the rest of the country or fraud. Wait didn't they argue that these states "are idiosyncratic in some respect" when comparing their model to another? Sorry can't have it both ways.

Lol. Bro.

https://github.com/fireeye

I appreciate your feedback. I hadn't heard of this site before and it clearly looked as though it was looking through the lens of a predetermined outcome.

You are a silly silly man. Listen to Rob. He says smart things.

How can a site named revolver.com not have accurate and reliable information about statistical models

@yetiCodes I stopped listening after the PA suit. Anything left legally is moot

All of you dumbass Republicans with your backwards thinking and fairy tales will be dispatched if not able to be reeducated.

~@james j

Oh goody, an almost different story for storytime today. I hope Delta Force wins this one.

Yeah

@busillis you get it

@james j I'm translating your posts so the ignorant masses can understand what you're saying. You can thank me later.

I’m unconvinced.

I’m convinced

https://mobile.twitter.com/Rothbard1776/status/1338757763464359941

But this.

@busillis communication is the first step to progress

Is wild.

Sure he was

Oh good god. Its still 2016.

What's going on with Delta Force? They've been dispatched to dispatch? What about posse comitatus?

Haha. I’m so curious to see if anything comes of this because that would be wild.

Didn’t that come out years ago