@TaLoN132 Russell Ramsland is a fucking dip shit.

Audited how? Comparing signatures to state issued identification upon ballot cast? Impossible. I once had to present an electic bill with drivers license to rent a car yet some states need no verification to authorize a license to kill? Nope! Not good enough. They are going to have to hack Edison in the future. America and foreign blood on their hands will NOT be accepted!!

@vfc alcutta do you understand what I am asking

You got to be kidding me right? It's their opinion. They've said that. They're not going to change that.

per the video...linked above @TaLoN132

@meglide I am asking about their opinion. What informs their opinion. I also have opinions. I don’t claim to have absolute truth of anything.

I understand that and you and I can have a nice discussion if you would like. But that won't work with them and why you can't see that I don't understand.

Like I have a option that Indian Jones is a good movie series. Then I can go into what informs that opinion. Motivations , values , etc @meglide

I thought the first one was okay but after that I'm not so sure. It's been a long time though since I've seen them.

My theory is that they don’t actually have any specific reason nor have they evaluated any of the evidence. They just trust it implicitly because they want to believe it. If that’s the case I would like to gauge the depth of their analysis. Like when they arrived at this conclusion of voter fraud how much did they actually think about it @meglide

China Joe, the open brain surgery zombie that cant orate and gropes women, 45yrs of flip flopping and warmongering, he got 80 million votes.. i dont believe it due to logic

@busillis also no the third one was best

@Ghostdog great present your best piece of evidence for fraud and we can evaluate it

no thanks, do some research for urself

there are 3 videos... could not make it through the 1st one.@james j

Look I've had these discussions with people I know personally on Facebook and they are futile. They think what they think and no matter what you say they're not going to change. And you can go into excruciating detail in this particular case or that particular case and it just does not matter. They are not rational about this in any way shape or form. so you just have to leave it at that's their opinion. It is what it is.

@Ghostdog you are the research subject. Only you can talk about your opinions and what convinces you of a particular stance over an other

Greenwald exposed this long ago. Who knows what DARPA has pumped out since

yeah my opinion

@meglide I believe that may be true the first time around but it opens up the door for them to actually think about it later with greater depth

Don't kid yourself. No it does not.

@Ghostdog right so in your opinion bring up a specific piece of e you think holds water and we can analyze it.

i dont care what you think sorry

@Ghostdog this is about what you think

i know what i think

Your thought process not mine.z

@Ghostdog right but I do t that’s why I am asking

you do not matter to me, sorry to burst ur bubble

@Ghostdog not once did I say this is what I think. I am asking about your thought tree

ask all you want, scream at the wall for all i care

@james j I tried to tell you but you wouldn't listen

@Ghostdog how are you turning a question about what you think into me pushing what I thinks

what i think is what i think, why do u care?

@Ghostdog screaming at a wall? Do you understand the question I am asking? I am asking for your thought process not mine

@Ghostdog so I can evaluate how you got form point A to point B

Exactly what I was trying to tell @james j

ur evaluation is not necessary but thanks for ur concern

@meglide I’m not contesting what he thinks I am asking what he thinks

@Ghostdog it necessary for me to understand how you get form point a to point b. This is a question about you

Why are you hiding how you come to your conclusions

its necessary for u but not me, im quite content in my own opinions not others