They did that in GA twice . Do you think they counted adjudicated ballots twice @Phil

they dont need to count them twice

i think recounting fraudulent ballots is silly, there needs to be actual audits

if they have to adjudicate 10% of ballots there is no reason to use the machines

the point of the machines is to avoid human counting

The only way they can be fraudulent is if they are “mystery ballots” @Ghostdog which is a a claim with no support. The video was meant to allude to this before being investigated and shown to be legitimate ballots

Aggregate over counties by a small fraction of adjucated votes and small margin of error could contribute to credible total. Add in flood of unverified mail-in ballots and Dominion becomes moot. It does mean that future elections by popular vote should be decried foul and urgency to call/write congress and round the nation mass petition.

@Phil an adjudicated ballots is something the machine can’t read

So people read them instead

For audit

A hand count is people doing that to all ballots

@inwa but remember there are different voting systems, at least two other companies, and yet dominion is statistically different

yes james, but the claim is that dominion seams to not be able to read a large proportion (>1%) of them. 68% if you believe the report. in any case the state standard is much less. in using the machines they are not expecting to have to manually review each one.

https://www.hbo.com/video/documentaries/kill-chain/videos/voting-machine-vulnerabilities

that wild

@Phil no that’s not what that means. The machine has no control over people being sloppy on their ballots

that might explain the USB's and the way they were passing them around....

That’s when they get adjudicated @Phil

@james j if people are "sloppy" more than an amount it makes the use of the machines pointless

No it doesn’t @Phil it just means you take care of them.

It’s not a high number @Phil of adjudicated ballots

@james j it is above the state standards

The error rate is not even about adjudicated ballots @Phil

@Phil this 65 percent number is based on nothing but the opinions of a car mechanic

that might well be true, but the margins between biden and trump are so small it doesnt need to be very high at all

It’s not a margins thing

We don’t even know what the real error rate number is

@james j i agree

Which means it is most likely within the margins as every ballot was recounted twice

is this suspicious or not? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5K2rvnQjv50

So the machines are not even a factor

How can Joe expect to become president with all the election fraud and China in his pocket??? With all the evidence they should begin HIS impeachment BEFOR he ever gets to office!!! But that’s probably what they had in mind all along…

@james j but lets say it was 5% - play along with me - each time a ballot raises an error it has an opportunity to be adjudicated, potentially changed, printed and reinserted into the count. this could impact the overall result. if 10% of the time it was flipped that would give biden an increase of 0.5%

Yeah that’s what that is @Ghostdog c mon man

thats true, if creepy uncle Joe gets in he will be impeached, then what Kamala or Pelosi?

@Phil no it could just be a paper jam. Then the just start the process over. All machine errors are made moot by a hand recount

its suspicious it seems, to be counting votes outside view of poll watchers

@Ghostdog how do you know what she was even doing

The machine can determine percentage of votes for one candidate while calculating both. Misread and throw error at intervals and kick ballot out which then becomes adjudicated and separated out. Those were determined, in some instances, to go into a separate pile to be counted separately. (From what I understand)

i have no clue what she was doing

How do you know they were ballots @Ghostdog