Message from @Phil
Discord ID: 788684136994177024
Based on how they used to
it doesnt need to be since in 2020 you have enough counties using dominion to detect a difference
where the machines were it happened tho
And if there was a “dominion effect” a manual recount puts that to rest as you are bypassing the machine @Phil
i am not going to explain again the opportunities to insert votes...i am sure you know those
You mean mystery ballots right
its not consistent, its where the machines were, according to that site
Why would you need mystery ballots if the machines are switching votes
yes its like if i give you a drug and you get better i cant say the drug works
but if i give it to two groups, one with the drug and one without i can test for a difference statistically
You can’t say the drug alone unless you had a control
That assumes you have no way to verify the machine
Hand counting is that verification
the machines print replacement ballots for those that are adjudicated
so they dont even need to bring in paper ballots
if the adjudication rate is > 5% , then it would be perfectly possible
Those adjudicated ballots are adjudicated under supervision
They already did this in Nevada. Found a .05 error
thats one of the best ones ive seen, just the stats not some political views
Not enough to change a election
Those were the off the street yelling mob watchers not the official watchers @Phil
Still no way to verify without identification.
hence why they conclude to audit the machines, not that it proves fraud
this particular analysis is very basic but useful
yes to restore faith in democracy, who doesnt want that
they can test the paper ballots to see which were printed and which were done by hand. this will help give the adjudication rate. if it is above state standards by a large amount they could argue the machines are untrustworthy and illegal.
have to watch this now, suggested at the bottom of the page... https://www.hbo.com/documentaries/kill-chain-the-cyber-war-on-americas-elections
They did that in GA twice . Do you think they counted adjudicated ballots twice @Phil
they dont need to count them twice
i think recounting fraudulent ballots is silly, there needs to be actual audits
if they have to adjudicate 10% of ballots there is no reason to use the machines
the point of the machines is to avoid human counting
The only way they can be fraudulent is if they are “mystery ballots” @Ghostdog which is a a claim with no support. The video was meant to allude to this before being investigated and shown to be legitimate ballots
Aggregate over counties by a small fraction of adjucated votes and small margin of error could contribute to credible total. Add in flood of unverified mail-in ballots and Dominion becomes moot. It does mean that future elections by popular vote should be decried foul and urgency to call/write congress and round the nation mass petition.
So people read them instead
For audit
A hand count is people doing that to all ballots