Message from @DrSammyD

Discord ID: 789300400997400596


2020-12-18 01:14:32 UTC  

That's not weird

2020-12-18 01:14:57 UTC  

I'm having a hard time believing that SolarWinds was a vector of attack on Microsoft.

2020-12-18 01:14:59 UTC  

They sure enough would have got put in prison.

2020-12-18 01:15:00 UTC  

Both houses of congress would have had his head on a platter

2020-12-18 01:15:08 UTC  

Exactly.

2020-12-18 01:15:14 UTC  

That's not what they're saying...

2020-12-18 01:15:25 UTC  

Is it?

2020-12-18 01:15:28 UTC  

Today? Pelosi says, 'Yea I know. That's why I put him on the intel committee'

2020-12-18 01:15:29 UTC  

That's what I keep reading in stories. They're reporting it wrong then.

2020-12-18 01:15:43 UTC  

I thought they use fire-eyed red team tools to gain access
.

2020-12-18 01:15:49 UTC  

What are they saying then? Iā€™m so confused

2020-12-18 01:15:53 UTC  

That doesn't make any sense

2020-12-18 01:16:09 UTC  

If solar winds is the vector, there's 0 chance anything important was breached.

2020-12-18 01:16:15 UTC  

Solar winds is like the software company of last resort.

2020-12-18 01:16:31 UTC  

That doesn't make sense...

2020-12-18 01:16:43 UTC  

Yeah, MS doesn't use solar winds (other than perhaps an acquisition which was still using it)

2020-12-18 01:16:51 UTC  

Damn I'm guess I'm going to read one of the articles...

2020-12-18 01:17:04 UTC  

Could that s*** be on azure as a software service?

2020-12-18 01:17:34 UTC  

Or it's all actual apps that run on Windows computers...

2020-12-18 01:17:39 UTC  

it could be hosted there, but it doesn't mean it's cracked the Azure security.

2020-12-18 01:18:00 UTC  

Heh

2020-12-18 01:18:13 UTC  

MS Azure can provide generic compute resources, essentially rented servers.

2020-12-18 01:18:19 UTC  

Totally isolated.

2020-12-18 01:18:24 UTC  

Yeah it could be that solar winds was inside of an azure service, but that would only compromise the VMs which were running it.

2020-12-18 01:18:59 UTC  

Yeah it doesn't make sense...

2020-12-18 01:20:35 UTC  

Why Justice Roberts does not want to take on Texas Lawsuit - Supreme court afraid of Riots and mop rule
https://video.parler.com/3M/Jo/3MJotTEm9kEu.mp4

2020-12-18 01:21:44 UTC  

Exactly. The only people stupider than 80 year old senators are ANYONE in the MSM.

2020-12-18 01:22:29 UTC  

Who is this?

2020-12-18 01:23:10 UTC  

theres so much fraud its hard to even track or compile it all

2020-12-18 01:23:41 UTC  

???

2020-12-18 01:24:13 UTC  

LOL. Yep. It's Orion running on Azure

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/771201221145919499/789301966819950592/unknown.png

2020-12-18 01:25:19 UTC  

multiple hearings in every state, hours after hours of fraud issues.. tip of the iceberg still lol

2020-12-18 01:25:33 UTC  

Ahh gotcha

2020-12-18 01:26:33 UTC  

It's true. Sadly there just isn't enough time given by the constitution. Which is why they put the clause in there for the states to choose if the popular vote wasn't secure.

2020-12-18 01:26:47 UTC  

I just don't understand why we aren't steering directly there.

2020-12-18 01:26:56 UTC  

@Uncivil Law covered this today on his YouTube channel: https://youtu.be/B7zNeyWmuzM

2020-12-18 01:27:47 UTC  

yeah there should be massive preparation for that battle, not debating small details still... but all the evidence could be used to make that case, what can me compiled

2020-12-18 01:29:29 UTC  

Most of this stuff shouldn't matter. The observers said it was solid. There is numerous and clear evidence that fraud COULD have taken place. The impression should be all that matters. You shouldn't have to prove it. If you can't have an election that is beyond reproach, it should just fall back to the state legislators as WAS INTENDED>

2020-12-18 01:34:01 UTC  

yeah thats well put, how it plays out could get interesting

2020-12-18 01:34:24 UTC  

never happened, lol šŸ™‚

2020-12-18 01:34:46 UTC  

they go in a room come out and Trump wins, leftists will snap