they have so many avenues now. (1) the private money from zuckerberg paid to finance the election (2) the money from soros to support friendly lawsuits to relax the voting laws (3) the dominion machines and their misuse (4) the monies paid by dominion to secretaries of state (5) the biden links with china and money (6) mitch's wifes connections with china (7) the (russia,china,iran) hacks related to solar winds (8) the statements of irregularities in vote counting
Trump had to make a new category of work no previous potus had for a schedule. Watching the news and ranting on Twitter. This was the majority of his "work" in office. That's not doing a job.
No, but to say “Lost” is to assert that the cases were heard, evidentiary hearings happened, examination and cross examination of witnesses, ruling, the whole 9 yards, and at that point the court ruled that there was no case.
But no, correct me if I’m wrong, but nobody actually heard any of these cases. So... To use Williams illustration, what you’re saying is assuming the game happened, both teams took the field and there was a clear winner, when in fact the game never started.
Melissa Carone testified before a judge. He said hundreds of people were in the building with you and none of them verify your testimony. Nice star witness. Judge after judge said look we are dismissing you on standing but the be clear there is no case on the merits here. You are speculating and bringing us trash.
I would argue that Trump waged a war on Biden’s legitimacy and though the courts largely refused to hear the case, the people heard the witnesses in these hearings and read affidavits and heard how someone could pull off election fraud and that speaks to people, especially when the Media’s reputation is trashed by their own doing, people are more willing to accept a witnesses testimony over the media’s interpretation of a witnesses testimony, so on that front you can say “he lost 1000 out of 200” but I would say you may be measuring success with the wrong metric.
