> I didn’t catch which stream Robert went over the Texas SCOTUS standing in. Does anyone know what his interpretation was? @Gypsy He said SCOTUS is bs and courts should jettison doctrines based on level of butthurt.
Do you think anyone has standing to sue if the vote was not faithful to the law of the legislature? I mean clearly Congress can step in when there is voter fraud but don’t you think states have measurable specific harm?
> What if the investigation linked joe to hunter could he still become president @Diablodeathlord Let's just say that at some point, you might want to think about recalibrating your expectations.
> Plus SCOTUS’ refusal to hear the case is a message to the legal community. Better they should have issued an opinion @Gypsy I actually agree but I have to defer to their legal wisdom.
