@SoonMrWick figure of speech

They ruled exactly as any competent court would @Gypsy

James claims he challenged me and I deflected his question. Notice James asks no actual question. James is unable to differentiate thoughts in his head from external reality.

@Gypsy challenged can come as counter examples to a given position

You just made statements having nothing to do with anything I was saying,

He asks rhetorical questions, or lead ins to strawman arguments. If you'd like to answer.

That’s you having an argument in your head. Nothing to do with me James.

Yeah you were complaining about Scotus and I said it would help the the Trump team actually brought up a non frivolous case @Gypsy

We have screenshot evidence that it is you deflecting 😂

You can’t read can you

non frivolous ?

https://tenor.com/view/omegalul-omega-lul-gif-9902854

@SoonMrWick no I get straight to the meat of the post

Dude is neo

I was complaining about administrative law. A nuanced topic you have no opinion on because you have no idea about the world just your surface level wants and desires 😂

The only meat you go for is @Maw

You were complaining about something that was not fraud related and something scotus did not rule in trumps favor as a reason to dismiss millions of votes @Gypsy

Did you even read the court cases @Gypsy

Did you james

ill argue like you

Lefties can't read

James didn't read the argument

Dude, I initiated no voter fraud conversation. This kid has to be trolling. He literally is making up conversations that didn’t happen lol

@SoonMrWick again you screenshot something I was 100 percent right about

https://youtu.be/QPMQpElyEqI

Way to create conspiracy theories you bumper

@Gypsy

If james would read the cases he could contribute to conversation rather than his typical democrat post.

@SoonMrWick actually read the post you screen shot in context next time

😂 so you’re screenshot your own post to prove I was talking about voter fraud. Excellent work.

I did. You don't even know. I'm 100 percent right.

@SoonMrWick only I have. You guys clearly just watch opinion shows that rant and rave about being wronged in the court and the judges are deep state

<a:pepePunch:680071485007724607>

@Gypsy not talking about fraud

That’s just the not was highlighted

Voter fraud still the topic of the day!?

James is just trolling again.

I’m pointing out Trump has no case for fraud and the flimsy constitutional case he brought forth does not mean you get to Invalidate millions of votes. Thus scotus ruled appropriately @Gypsy

I never was discussing this. So I don’t know how you could be conversing with me on this topic. Weird.

Well. Think he will pardon Snowden now? He'd be pardoning a russian family.