Message from @james j
Discord ID: 792526264387764234
It's only election fraud if it doesn't happen in a Democrat primary @Gypsy
@SoonMrWick so what
@SoonMrWick I was right the bimmy guy was wrong
I think we've all seen today regarding the friendly bomber @james j is just trolling.
I was right he we I gave 100 percent wrong in his calculation @SoonMrWick
You're always right King James 👑
Conversations are two way streets. You want to prosthelityze . When anyone asks anything of you, you claim it’s deflection.
@busillis you look me in the eye and tell me this wasn’t the most considerate bomber to have every been
Agreed lol
That wasn't the most considerate bomber to have ever been
..... Where's your eye and why am I only going to be looking at one?
Because when you ask people things it’s in the middle of you being challenged. It’s deflection so you don’t have to answer @Gypsy
You challenged my position that ridding ourselves of administrative law would help the country? That was my scotus position
No I challenged your position that scotus was not doing their job @Gypsy
@SoonMrWick figure of speech
James claims he challenged me and I deflected his question. Notice James asks no actual question. James is unable to differentiate thoughts in his head from external reality.
You just made statements having nothing to do with anything I was saying,
He asks rhetorical questions, or lead ins to strawman arguments. If you'd like to answer.
That’s you having an argument in your head. Nothing to do with me James.
Yeah you were complaining about Scotus and I said it would help the the Trump team actually brought up a non frivolous case @Gypsy
We have screenshot evidence that it is you deflecting 😂
You can’t read can you
non frivolous ?
@SoonMrWick no I get straight to the meat of the post
Dude is neo
I was complaining about administrative law. A nuanced topic you have no opinion on because you have no idea about the world just your surface level wants and desires 😂
The only meat you go for is @Maw
You were complaining about something that was not fraud related and something scotus did not rule in trumps favor as a reason to dismiss millions of votes @Gypsy
Did you james
ill argue like you
Lefties can't read
James didn't read the argument
Dude, I initiated no voter fraud conversation. This kid has to be trolling. He literally is making up conversations that didn’t happen lol