Message from @Doc
Discord ID: 792580616763473931
It's much easier to spin wild speculation then to actually do something.
You’re unable to understand the analogous situation I put before you because it requires critical thinking. And unable to understand anything besides a progressive POV
You know what has less effects if you're younger than 70?
The damn virus.
Who saw the Miami doctor and his article. im sure he will jump out of a window
Do you have a normal percentage that is considered the “acceptable limit”? I know that vaccines all run risks. That’s just how it goes. Do you know if there is a standard percentage considered acceptable?
0
no
No. I don't. But 2.8 percent is higher than the virus itself.
Sarcasm + slow typing.
2.8 of a severe reaction which has a low chance of killing you.
It's not a 2.8% death rate. lol
I have a low chance of dying right now though.
can I now air my opinions on computers?
so should I take it or not?!
Is this a robot overlord deal?
lol sorry doc
no, i just dont know anything about computers.
Your analogy was terrible. Half the GOP senate wanted not enough money spent poorly. Half wanted zero aid. Trump wanted to spend more than the Dems but as usual spend no time doing any work to get it done. The dems made a proposal and were willing to reduce aid as long as some went to the citizens not big corps. The GOP botched it front to back and you blame Pelosi. Facts dont agree with your stance. If you got it done Trump probably would have won. That's leverage a key component to negotiating. You may not like the "dem wishlist". Trump was going to torpedo the deal even if McConnell did negotiate ie-he just did. Your facts are faulty.
i do
lol
Alright CNN. I am wrong. Lol
That's subjective
Ultimately it should be a discussion with a doctor and a personal decision. I'm just trying to get the info out that I know will be actively supressed.
He knows more than us cause he is informed by Don Lemon.
Facts are not subjective. Those things were not my opinion. It's what literally happened.
You’re conflating your interpretation of events with facts.
You should do your own research. You should Think about whether or not you are in a susceptible age range to contract the virus and have serious problems , have prior immuno compromising issues, and make a decision about whether a virus with an almost 97% recovery rate for a perfectly healthy, normal, active adult is worth taking a vaccine for with only a 90% chance of preventing contracting the virus while keeping potential side effects in mind.
How are the so-called facts derived
?
CNN
All i do is research. want advice from my peers.
Wheres the passed senate bill featuring McConnell plan then? Where is Trumps plan?
But yeah, anaphylactic responses are not like, this severe reaction which you're just going to die of 100% of the time. Even if you go into shock (very rare on top of very rare), if you're fairly young you've got a very rare mortality rate. You have to work this information in layers, not just compare the IFR to an adverse reaction rate of 2.8%.
I have a degree in Facebook studies.
I think I can deduce from this
lol