Ultimately it should be a discussion with a doctor and a personal decision. I'm just trying to get the info out that I know will be actively supressed.

https://www.meme-arsenal.com/memes/8c68fb8f519f5bd7b9fc329f24f34f3d.jpg

He knows more than us cause he is informed by Don Lemon.

Facts are not subjective. Those things were not my opinion. It's what literally happened.

You’re conflating your interpretation of events with facts.

You should do your own research. You should Think about whether or not you are in a susceptible age range to contract the virus and have serious problems , have prior immuno compromising issues, and make a decision about whether a virus with an almost 97% recovery rate for a perfectly healthy, normal, active adult is worth taking a vaccine for with only a 90% chance of preventing contracting the virus while keeping potential side effects in mind.

How are the so-called facts derived

?

CNN

All i do is research. want advice from my peers.

Wheres the passed senate bill featuring McConnell plan then? Where is Trumps plan?

I was going to say Twitter @Gypsy

But yeah, anaphylactic responses are not like, this severe reaction which you're just going to die of 100% of the time. Even if you go into shock (very rare on top of very rare), if you're fairly young you've got a very rare mortality rate. You have to work this information in layers, not just compare the IFR to an adverse reaction rate of 2.8%.

I have a degree in Facebook studies.

I think I can deduce from this

lol

Probably more accurate.

?

@Gypsy I have read 1000 articles on boxing. Im pretty sure I will be winning a gold medal come the olympics.

How does that look on a resume@Gypsy ?

Factual accountings of what happened. Truth > truthiness

Political parties are not full of people with the exact same views. Some people are more fiscally conservative others are more socially conservative. It’s a group of people. They all have their own point of you. They all have different goals. Some want to be politicians to help people. Someone to be politicians because they want money. Some are career politicians. Some actually want to change the world.

You refuse to even entertain the idea that I am right. Makes no sense to argue. I say the bill wasn’t in good faith, you act as if Nancy Pelosi and the DNC are tone deaf and had no idea nobody in the GOP would like it. Cannot converse with an unreasonable person

Is taking up the mantle of James?

Exactly

I put it at the top so I stand out.

😂 I am basically a Jedi by the same principle

James 2.0

another one....
https://m.facebook.com/23WIFR/videos/152213349703322/

Facebook never stops enlightening.

I didnt say the GOP would like it. Dont trot out the dense strawmen. I said the dems had leverage and the GOP failed.

https://twitter.com/TheVengeance17/status/1343022837859282945?s=19

I agree, except there are only 6 senators who are fiscally conservative and very few house members. Money printer goes brrrrrrrr

i was born here HGAHAHAHA

It was never going to get a yes vote by the GOP. That’s not a straw man. That’s fax 😎

Which carried a penalty of Trump losing because they couldnt get their shit together to negotiate. But that doesnt mean you arent lying. Pelosi passed aid. You just didnt like it.

If we're lucky enough all politicians will follow in the footsteps of https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/18/us/dennis-hastert-released.html

It’s just crazy when one side refuses to even hear the other side. NOBODY IN THE GOP WAS GOING TO VOTE YES. EVER. that’s not good faith. Stop trolling James 2.0

He was a good man.