She dewded it back to the bombers mom

This guy have been planning this for quite some time.

Or at least thinking about it.

I don't think it's likely that you could tool up to that kind of explosive capability with no practice or skill set in that regard.

I think he targeted AT&t because there's some kind of grudge against AT&t.

With all of these quit claim deed would it be to get around the death tax? If he had the house deeded to the girl and then the girl deeded it back to his mom?

That's why I figure at some point there will be a manifesto or some sort of explanation. It could be in the mail to several places. If he cared enough to take care of the deeds, he would have made arrangements to explain himself, I would think.

Possibly good point..

Also a good point

https://finance.zacks.com/tax-quitclaim-principal-residence-11870.html

https://budgeting.thenest.com/land-gift-tax-implications-30496.html

I wonder if you blow yourself up if you still have to file form 709

Or is someone else on the hook

Damn doc was right the guy told someone that he had cancer

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9092055/Nashville-Christmas-bomber-claimed-cancer-attack.html

Either that or he was using the cancer excuse to explain his odd actions.

Doc came up with the cancer thing

As part of his profile.

Doesn’t seem like it’s an excuse if he thought he was terminal. His priorities changed.

He also pivoted to the reason AT&t was targeted was because someone was injured by ATT and that seems to what the article above is indicating.

Apparently, his Dad who died in 2010 worked for Bell South/AT&T.

Maybe it wasn't excuse

He had been thinking about this for a long time.

I'm just saying that anyone can claim to have cancer. If someone seemed to be getting their affairs in order ahead of a criminal act and someone they know became suspicious, they can just say that they have cancer and people will understand. It will be interesting to see if a doctor will come forward to confirm the diagnosis.

It doesn't seem like you would be able to create an explosion like that without practice.

Or tangible knowledge with material sources.

Fair enough

To the man with a hammer, every problem is a nail.

So you're saying the dude was sitting on loads of explosives?

I am saying that whatever his motive, that he already had these expertise is a good assumption.

Agree

That's what I was saying too

Like the guy who built the armored bulldozer, he was already a welder. He had the bulldozer and then it was just a matter of using his welding skills. I think only he died in that event also.

Hey Did

If I remember correctly he had some beef with some City official

Or someone in the town

Well the city officials were also the family that owned most the property and business. Honestly you really do see his point of view after watching the documentary where they interview everyone. You can tell straight away they are corrupt hustlers. But he should have just sold his stuff and went and traveled.

“Violence is the last resort of an incompetent man.”

An oversimplification for sure but a good rule of thumb. Once you make a person, community or organization your enemy, you must either finish it or submit to their authority. Choices I don’t care for 😂

Probably best not to make too many enemies.

It’s really the fact that war doesn’t end well even when it does that detracts me from wanting to make enemies

I'm curious as to what explosives this guy was using?

I doubt we will know for 6 months. I bet they keep it under wraps. The concern I have is the ease at which a bad state actor or non state actor could cause hysteria with copy cat bombings or hoaxes. And then the increased laws, surveillance and measures taken for “safety”.