Message from @chuchomucho
Discord ID: 793545145969541170
can you provide me some?
and not an op-ed article.
Of the court cases which one did not give the plaintiff due process: I’m not doing your homework. You made the positive claims now support it @rip.lul
they changed the rules illegally, they did not go through the correct process of changing them
That is fruad
My claim; I have not seen nonpartisan due process. Its potentially out there. I just havent seen it.
@james j You could also just say 'no evidence'. That's how making claims works, as is my understanding.
No fraud. No evidence. Next.
@chuchomucho that isn’t fraud. That’s a state issue they argued in court and the Supreme Court of that court said it was permissible. That is the end of the line. Rule changes is not fraud and if the republicans really cared or thought it was bad they would have challenged it before the election in court. They did not do this. They only did this after they lost. Again this is not a fraud case showing any fraud occurred
I'll post it on Parler so I can use it as a source.
Heh Parler
no, its just a violation of the constituion.
And a Tweet too.
@rip.lul due process is the plantiff and the defendant getting their day in court. Everyone got their day in court and the courts ruled via the constitution. Provide a counter example if you have it
I dont. You seem to be informed on the situation. Thats why I am asking.
No it’s isn’t the state Supreme Court decided how to interpret the constitution of their state @rip.lul not Texas. Again not fraud
You made the positive claim due process did not happen. Why are you claiming this without any proof @rip.lul
the positive claim? lol I said I havent seen total due process. That doesnt mean its not out there.
instead of providing sources on your positive claim you tell me to ' do homework'
So, this is what happened, the changed the rules last minute illegally because they did not go through the legislator. Then some people where fed misinformation to diminish the validity of the actual fraud, to make us argue over this crap. I heard over 12 hours of testimony that I would say requires a more transparent look into this. You can say it wasn’t fraud but it led to a large opportunity of fraud, that probably did happen. I don’t think they will ever admit to it as they will get sued, they are just going to sweep everything under the rug.
this is exactly what happened.
@rip.lul again show where the constitution was violated and the Trump team did not get due process. This is your claim to support
So, this is what happened, the changed the rules last minute illegally because they did not go through the legislator. Then some people where fed misinformation to diminish the validity of the actual fraud, to make us argue over this crap. I heard over 12 hours of testimony that I would say requires a more transparent look into this. You can say it wasn’t fraud but it led to a large opportunity of fraud, that probably did happen. I don’t think they will ever admit to it as they will get sued, they are just going to sweep everything under the rug.
to quote @chuchomucho
I didnt mean there was no due process. I meant I have not seen it.
@chuchomucho no all rule changes were made with plenty of time to be challenged. They were not challenged until after trump lost the election. In addition to that rules changes are not fraud.
Because they GOP is in it with them
The GOP got bought out
They all have been for years
@chuchomucho then why go after the election only after they lost
Bro are you just fucking dumb. I said I personally havent seen it. Not saying it didnt happen..
Because its a show to please the people
well. thats answerable
its all scripted, they fought for us, ya right
@rip.lul which state and which specific case and which specific rule are you talking about that was changed.
It was in this show, Ill look it up reasl quick
you are brain worms.