Message from @rip.lul
Discord ID: 793899901187915777
Eye witness testimony is notoriously unreliable. There are study after study that proves this... Here's the kicker, though. Unbiased eye witness testimony is unreliable. The circumstances of these witnesses are not even that... These are *biased* witnesses who heard for 7 months that this was going to be a fraudulent election and it was their patriotic duty to root out that fraud and protect their leader. This is the very definition of confirmation bias, so I am not surprised that there are so many "witnesses" - I think a case could be made that there should have been more.
Regarding news reporters, they are trained to make things more sensational. They are told that there is a plumbing leak, but reporting a water main break will likely get them on the air. It's a cutthroat business and they are often making it up as they go. If you have ever been interviewed, you will see it's hard enough to be accurately quoted when you have been recorded. Using that as proof that something shady occurred is tenuous at best.
100% no fraud. its obvious.
I’m sure both Dems and GOP want trump out so I don’t think it matters if they are Reps or dems. This was all sleight of hand, because they had already cheated by changing the rules without following the constitution. This let to the possibility of fraud which probably happened.
Humans are flawed. Mistakes do happen. Widespread systematic mistakes concern me.
Did you see the investigation @chuchomucho
If it was just GA then I would be concerned but less so that it being MI, GA, WI, PA, and AZ.
That seems like hearsay to me or someone trying to cover their ass from getting fired. You think they would actually ever admit to letting this happen?
Find enough actual mistakes that matter without use of gossip as evidence @Livingstone
<a:Fart:793703838209015828>
Democrat is short for Destablization
They are both in on it
<a:WickWalk:793703000169644043>
@chuchomucho it’s a review of the 15 hours of video by a independent election investigation. Hearsay is saying there is fraud in that video without knowing what is happening in the video
How about the Navarro Report? Or is that just gossip as well.
So... your proof is your belief that your wildly popular champion of the people with immense leadership acumen was absolutely impotent at being able to prevent the fraud that he knew was coming??? Sounds like perfectly sound logic to me.
Controversial video released today.
https://crossfire.movie
@Livingstone Jesus Trumps lackie making a chart of is not proof
Every election would fit that chart
Dude. This guy spent more years as a Democrat than as a trump supporter.
I dont care if Trump won or not, but they did cheat/ They will continue to cheat. its not about Trump or Biden
I mean actual provable thing brought to court @Livingstone
So what ? He is trumps lackie beholden to Trump
The courts are not
The video Is not proof of cheating @chuchomucho
It is when u start counting without observers.
It doesnt matter if it was intentional or not
Trump spent more years as a Democrat that I've been alive and I'm no spring chicken
They should have gone and got them before they started counting again
The full video shows observers were present for the Required portion of validating votes @chuchomucho
Six. Six dimensions of cheating is not enough. Normally just the one chain of custody is enough to warrant an investigation. You are saying that the data he collected and can prove is just worth nothing?
You realize If something funny happened in the counting process it would be caught in the two full hand recounts @chuchomucho
That chart could be made for every election. Go find me a court case @Livingstone
1) they don't have to according to the law 2) there were two more counts after the first count where observers were present
They had plenty of time to fix any discrepancies
When our government f%^#s up they rarely admit it, they would rather cover it up to save their butts.
huh? who is they? and what discrepancies? ... why not just fraud happened and if we don't find evidence it's because they covered their tracks and disposed of all the evidence?
You are just making up conspiracies to justify previous conspiracies @chuchomucho