???

i've lost myself in the covo. a little slow today.

I miss anything today?

Same old.

i see Saudi Arabia & co making use of the newly purchased drones & smart bombs

You're more abreast of the news than..

I am

you know me, keeping my eyes and ears open...waiting for the invasion.

I'm sure this equipment will only be used for humanitarian purposes.

100%. We only sell to nations with immaculate human rights records.

:thonk:

@Crypto-John Yes, I watched most of it. What did you think? I understand that people think it is the same old thing, but I don’t think so. I am doubtful that the ballots will be produced that they are asking for.

Voting for them would create gridlock in DC

Without a doubt no ballots will be turned over.

Mr. @busillis#0807 rules for organizations.

1. Never ever ever ever admit wrongdoing.
2. If wrongdoing must be insinuated fire a bunch of low-level people let them take the hit.

What happens if the Georgia ballots are not counted by January 6th to prove that their ballot certification is valid? Who exactly is the “low-level” person that will take the hit?

@Lorinda Before those rules there's unwritten rules... Like dig up ALL dirt on counterparts and opponents, as you will need it later. Keep digging.

Never take responsibility for anything.

That's why I always use We.

Everything is about power, sometimes money denotes power.

https://www.businessinsider.com/new-georgia-senate-runoff-polls-show-democratic-candidates-leading-2020-12

Call me an idealist, but I just want to know the truth no matter what and I also want the Republic to be a true Republic. Last year a young man asked if I thought Trump would be found guilty and my response was that I thought it was baloney, BUT that I believe in our justice system and if people really think they have been wronged, we should hear them out....

I understand that Trump has money and power, but I don’t think that just being rich means that you are corrupt.

If you are only willing to accept a public conclusion you've personally already reached, you're doing it wrong.

I do question the integrity of politicians who are extremely wealthy.

All that I know to do is to listen to as many people as I can and try to verify what they say to the best of my ability. I do not trust mainstream media. My credible source list has dwindled. I trust people like you more than any “new’s station.”

@Lorinda, you just advanced to level 3!

Holy cr@p... I am watching the GA hearing and they had these supposed data scientists that should be ashamed of themselves. They completely misrepresented the flow of data and again are trying to assert that the NYT data feed is an accurate representation of election night data and that the tabulation occurs at Scytl (as opposed to tabulated data being sent to Scytl for web presentation). Since both of these assumptions are incorrect and they are the basis for their analysis, it invalidates everything else they claim. One of the first steps of any legitimate data analysis is verifying that the data you have is actually sound - they obviously did not... And, yet, they state that they have "proof" of fraud. It is absolutely ridiculous.

If I had more time, I'd make it my near term mission to expose them for the frauds they are. The sad thing is non-technical people will hear that some expert proved something that they hope is true.

Everything they said actually makes sense. It can be proved or disproved-just like the allegations of ballots being shredded. It really wasn’t all that technical.

I wonder how these people will be able to gain employment after all of this?

The typical tactic is to completely misrepresent what the data means. Idk I do but, really???

Utterly and completely misrepresent.

What some of these people are doing is shameful.

It isn't meant to hold up in court. It's meant to hit precisely the mark that it does every time. Observe.

It doesn't make sense when you personally understand the processes it makes sense in the context that they're presenting it.p

It's like the 68% of faulty ballots....

That whole deal is just damn lie.

The court of public opinion.

68% of the ballots were not able to be counted by the machines but the ballots were not uncounted.

It is technical when they say the machines are hooked up to the internet, when they're actually not.

@busillis Yup. But that makes no difference to confirmation bias.

It's like these people have never known what a local sever is.

Doesn't matter. They said it out loud. That's all they needed to do.