Message from @Zuluzeit

Discord ID: 773003249322164273


2020-11-03 01:42:12 UTC  

Lol

2020-11-03 01:42:12 UTC  

also do it in one term and then die right after

2020-11-03 01:42:43 UTC  

The gold standard was a physical, intrinsic reference for value.

2020-11-03 01:42:55 UTC  

Im saying this unironically

2020-11-03 01:45:09 UTC  

just tell Trump they took our Gold @Auto

2020-11-03 01:45:27 UTC  

@Zuluzeit I mean, I am open to criticism of the Fed but inflation has upsides and downsides. For example, inflation encourages people not to sit on their money. It also helps adjust prices because elasticity of prices varies. So instead of everyone getting pay decreases you get less pay increases. So if you are in favor or against it will come down to what you believe the very day citizen prioritizes. Because you and I can still purchase Gold to hedge against inflation. Also, the inflation numbers coming from the Fed are often suspect. Imo

2020-11-03 01:46:23 UTC  

The Fed is a racket.

2020-11-03 01:46:46 UTC  

@Zuluzeit anything can be a racket if it’s monopolized by the government and abused.

2020-11-03 01:46:47 UTC  

They jerk the leash whenever they need.

2020-11-03 01:47:52 UTC  

The Fed isn't monopolized by the government. It's privately owned. Even Trump couldn't do anything...and he tried, publicly.

2020-11-03 01:48:07 UTC  

@Zuluzeit I think you see nefariousness where it’s really incompetence. They have no financial incentive for bias. Their money is in a blind trust, where all public servants should have their money 😂

2020-11-03 01:48:23 UTC  

@Zuluzeit 👌 man 😂

2020-11-03 01:49:17 UTC  

I don't believe they get things wrong by accident. It's all orchestrated.

2020-11-03 01:50:45 UTC  

@Zuluzeit you’re misinterpreting what semi-private means in this context. Imo. It is financiers who take advantage of the incompetence of the Fed. Not an orchestrated attack on your pocket. And politician who help by expanding the mandate of the Fed to include unemployment and market performance.

2020-11-03 01:51:16 UTC  

Isnt the Fed Buying up stocks now or did i woosh something here?

2020-11-03 01:51:22 UTC  

Unemployment shouldn’t even be a government mandate let alone the feds.

2020-11-03 01:51:55 UTC  

They are, because they now have 3 mandates. And market performance is one of those mandates. Which is ridiculous to say the least.

2020-11-03 01:53:49 UTC  

The fed should only be concerned with money supply. It would be difficult to back to a gold standard. Cheap money drives out better money. If we tried it would be replaced by cryptocurrency or some other cheap money.

2020-11-03 01:54:50 UTC  

There is no safe lynch pin to pull.

2020-11-03 01:55:29 UTC  

government involvement has never "FIXed" anything think Regan said it best "Government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem."

2020-11-03 01:58:56 UTC  

Tbh I'm still stuck on squaring control over value and having no incentive for bias.

2020-11-03 02:00:09 UTC  

It’s called moral hazard and one way to insulate against it is to have wealth stored in blind trusts.

2020-11-03 02:00:17 UTC  

Bias is inescapable

2020-11-03 02:02:11 UTC  

still scrambling to find the "Next Best Thing"

2020-11-03 02:04:39 UTC  

It doesn’t matter because even fans of the Fed have to be cautious now that Kashkari has said moral hazard isn’t an issue

2020-11-03 02:05:03 UTC  

I think this is going to be an interesting year 😂

2020-11-03 02:05:31 UTC  

Ok so they do have financial incentive for bias. That was the part of your argument that had me concerned.

2020-11-03 02:05:56 UTC  

Or explanation

2020-11-03 02:06:09 UTC  

No they have biases because they are people. They have no financial incentive other than a healthy economy.

2020-11-03 02:07:04 UTC  

That is inconceivable to me. Maybe I'm just slow.

2020-11-03 02:07:22 UTC  

But respectfully (to them) they are not the most competent people at understanding Macroeconomics. People who are at the top of macroeconomics are making huge amounts of money in finance.

2020-11-03 02:08:10 UTC  

Because all of their wealth is held in blind trusts. So if they favored one industry or sector over another they might inadvertently screw themselves.

2020-11-03 02:09:23 UTC  

But blindly enrich someone else. Got it.

2020-11-03 02:12:30 UTC  

Yeah, they could make someone rich. But they really don’t have that sort of attitude imo. The way Roberts sees himself protecting the institution of SCOTUS (I am not a lawyer I just gather this from all the lawyers I see talk) The Fed chairman and board want to protect the institution of the Fed. Plus it would be hard to get away with. If they favored someone competitors would probably be interested in uncovering corruption.

2020-11-03 02:13:44 UTC  

Unless it always eventually swings the direction of everyone with a stake and they accept it for overall gain.

2020-11-03 02:14:22 UTC  

Everyone with a stake is you and I and your grandma

2020-11-03 02:14:57 UTC  

I'm not sure it scales well but ok.

2020-11-03 02:16:13 UTC  

Everyone who doesn’t have a guaranteed state funded retirement will be getting their retirement from the market. Whether it’s equity or bonds etc. and social security is not a reliable retirement plan. money held by institutions is your money man.

2020-11-03 02:16:35 UTC  

Also state funded retirement is a scam on the tax payer. Please don’t screenshot.

2020-11-03 02:16:38 UTC  

Lol

2020-11-03 02:17:37 UTC  

One for you, ten for me and they are all worth half now...and on and on.