Message from @mandarinorange
Discord ID: 776269486033862707
lol
other than that just normal ppl
"youre being so neurological! Stop it!"
they dems r like hey how about we just remove all logic
no more logos
no more God lol
anyone here happen to do accounting
Well if you wanna get super scientific each race has "evolutionary" traits that put us all over the place in tons and tons different aspects but ultimately we equal out. Things such as fast twitch muscle, immunity and vulnerability to different diseases and illnesses etc etc
no such thing as a human race. Races are used to distinguish between cohorts of bred animals.
If you want to be scientific about it and subclassify humans, the proper term would be subspecies.
Okay so shoot me on the technicality lmao
I have no idea what you mean about equal out, though. The north american wolf is slightly larger and more colored than the european wolf.
the San is slightly smaller and somewhat different colored than I am.
What about bite force, life span, muscle density, bone density
all subject to biological variations, and usually a little offset between subspecies.
Which would indicate that despite an immediate marker like the larger size that the idea of superiority of any sort is just silly?
you would have to name the task, for "superior" to make sense.
The african elephant is superior in higher temperature climates because its ears are larger than the indian elephant, so it can lose more heat.
The indian elephant will overheat in africa and could therefore be deemed inferior on the african continent. Or unfitted....
the polar bear would be the superior seal hunter when compared to the brown bear/grizzly.
Yes and if you swap them out of their respective environments the aadvantage is gone, bringing them closer to equal comparison, humans do not live by the law of nature we blatantly defy it.
Not anymore than the locust.
a virus, maybe.
or a cancer
But your point, that the indian and african elephant are "equal" makes no sense to me.
They are adapted to different enviroments.
I thought I was agreeing with you, I was just saying people are asshats and alot of the time people aren't "racist" by definition. Im not used to people making me think so much.
its just an argument for those with no argument
no, these are observations. You might be accustomed to opinions.
unless theres like an instance obvi
Humans with darker skin are more adapt to hot sunny environments and have a resistance to certain melanomas if Im not mistaken correct ?
if you observe the term "racist" it is very hard to make sense of it.
ummm
no
darker skin you have more melanin
as with "conservative" "liberal" and "discrimination"
@evildood89 correct
Melanoma is a type of skin cancer
ok sure melanoma is skin cancer