Every time there is a vehicle collision with an officer as well.

there are privacy laws that would conflict with that i believe

in many states

they would have to redact facial information of anyone not involved

Some states already do this.

right

but this requires nationwide bodycam rollout, and budgets for the data storage and editing

the left does not want to give any more money to the police, the right does not want to put any more oversight on the police

I'm not a proponent of the defund the police movement.

im not saying you are im talking about the political situation in general its stuck at an impasse realistically

i'm not sure how legislation could be crafted

I don't think anyone would disagree if you labeled an increase in funding specifically for more oversight.

I think almost everyone would agree to this.

Even the right.

im not so sure about that

@RobertGrulerEsq They cant demonitize or censor if you are in legal discussions or news and id say a scotus case is both.

@dnindustry, you just advanced to level 3!

@dnindustry they can and do to many streamers

Remember all the time in the recent news cycles they've censored articles?

So apparently we have 17 attorney generals supporting the Texas Case? And if the court allows tomorrow or friday 7 to join. Anyone else see this?

Everyone in the pile

How legally binding is Biden's Voter Fraud Network comments if they are a true admission to crime?

Like if OJ Simpson now admits to killing Nicole. Would that be binding at all?

Thats a good question. I mean how long were German Nazis persecuted after world war 2?

He never recanted his comments.

And if someone came out today and said they were part of 9/11 would they be prosecuted now?

all he has to do is say he misspoke

@Bryrod10 they are still being prosecuted today in germany

Yes I know that.

@Bryrod10, you just advanced to level 1!

but

they have different legal rules than we do

Whats level 1

activity level

Your server rank.

!rank

!rank

Whats the highest rank?

1