i love when they fire a bunch of people who were maintaining esoteric systems and then replace it with remote workers who barely understand basic networking concepts like subnettic

*subnetting

I love it when people whom I watch do their jobs for years approach each instance of a recurring problem as a freshly new and baffling conundrum.

Like Ice T on SVU?

Hahaha never seen it but I can easily envision him playing a character that is written that way. All furrowed brow and pensive scowl.

😂😂😂 Exactly!!

Hahaha

why did some of the states join and why did some file amicus briefs only?

Resources and/or Political Will?

A more interesting question is why hasn't anyone joined the Respondents/Defense

Makes sense. I didnt know you can do that.

Amicus Briefs can be in support of the Defense.

PA responded brutally

Most Respondents are Brutal.

When will scotus decide to hear or not

When they feel like it🤷

I think they set a deadline 😃

I'm sure they are on a short Timeline. It's really up to them.

how does this affect the electors? Are they going forward or is it on hold until its resolved?

@Notsousefulidiot, you just advanced to level 1!

As of right now going forward absent of an Order from the Court.

Whats going on thr Trump's personal lawsuit ?

It looks like Wash DC + 20 states filed with the 4 states accused

Interesting

juicy

I think trumps in several lawsuits

I am probably wrong but I thought some did respond on the opposite side of Texas scotus. Other states I mean

Yeah it looks like all 4 states did their own thing and the rest signed a filing together

Sounds like a Blue Red Battle.

A red vs blue+red? 😂

Its going to be interesting

Yes, very Interesting!

Was it PA and GA legislatures that filed amicus

No they had to Respond.

I think it may make the Hanging Chad look like a Pimple on the Ass if they take the Case?

What if one case proves there are 6000 illegal votes in the duplicated ballots but it is not enough to overturn the 12000 difference so it is dismissed. Then there is another case that proves there is 5000 illegal votes in the mail-in votes but it is dismissed because it is not enough to change the results. Then there is a third case that proves there are 4000 votes that were switched in the voting machines but it is dismissed because it is not enough. The election stands even though 15000 votes are proven illegal? More than the difference.

They are not looking at Votes. They are looking at Process and Law. Did the Process violate the Law.

Depends what was asked for.

I think it’s just about breaking the law and putting it back to legislatures in each of 4 states

If there is anything I learned it that its great to be a criminal bc fraud is really difficult to prove

The fraud they claim isnt