Message from @busillis
Discord ID: 786969763011362867
I listened to your show yesterday. Talent's arguments are full of holes which is why I suspect you're not answering them.
After all your hype about latches, suddenly they're ok?
There was on-going litigation, so no sense in raising more until those matters were settled - and what about the last minute changes;
Does the state's distinction between absentee and mail-in ballots cover the lack of verification as to who sent the ballot?
Georgia's recounts did not include signature verification - so that is blatant falsehood;
It is everyone's business if cheating in one state affects everyone.
I stopped listening after that.
I hope you do better tomorrow.
I think Rob is at a conference thing
> It is everyone's business if cheating in one state affects everyone.
@English Remi Don't go developing amnesia about what you wished for in the totally unforeseeable and super unlikely event that it will come up again regarding voter suppression or some such.
Is there a show tonight? or not because of the conference?
No show until Monday 👍🏼
Thanks just miss the show
Hey everyone. I'm new here. I should have started with this message first, but I couldn't resist going to the election2020 chat haha 😛 hope everyone is doing well.
disseminates secretly gleaned Intel
Hopefully it will be a good show Monday.
You’re always onto my intel 😂
Well is it good Intel? Are you a double agent? 😄
@GlimmerMan, you just advanced to level 2!
oh thanks bot
That would be a waste of my intel 😉
@Beth, you just advanced to level 17!
Hey don’t 💩 my words, you little 💩
??? Me said you like to stir the poo...
Anyone else watch Zeducation on YouTube? He has some good stuff. I like him.
No you were stirring 💩.. I 🤮 on @Zuluzeit yesterday, think I offended him 😂
Guilty as charged💯
Lots of poo going around today
You’ll get used to this soon 🙃
Primates always sling poo
Oh boy. Well internet poo smells better than real poo. so i guess it's ok...
Oh lord
I'll give you that point.
And have to agree
Where's are leader? I guess at that conference... He should start a cult.
I am vacating from the 💩 conversation.. I’ll be back later. Over and out 🙋🏼♀️
Yes Beth... What can I do for you today? Please send the donation. Lord
Being omnipotent, but bad with money is the way I've rolled for eternity..
regarding the GA signature verification issue here is a response from the GA sec of state https://www.11alive.com/article/news/politics/brad-raffensperger-david-shafer-response-signature-audit/85-f42e59d4-445e-4d6c-affb-25374a1ecb24
@English Remi of note: "Judge Grimberg also rejected that there was sufficient evidence to indicate an improperly-done signature verification process had affected Georgia's results.
"Wood’s argument is that the procedures in the Settlement Agreement regarding information and signature match so overwhelmed ballot clerks that the rate of rejection plummeted and, ergo, invalid ballots were passed over and counted. This argument is belied by the record; the percentage of absentee ballots rejected for missing or mismatched information and signature is the exact same for the 2018 election and the General Election (.15%). This is despite a substantial increase in the total number of absentee ballots submitted by voters during the General Election as compared to the 2018 election," the judge wrote."
@English Remi also of note: "Because absentee mail-in ballots are separated from the envelopes they're submitted in, and because those envelopes are the only documentation on which there is a signature, in the event of an audit of those envelopes there would be no possible way to tie "bad" signatures to the actual votes they were cast with.
But the legal strategy of the president's advocates appears to be that if some number of invalid envelopes could be found, they could argue a larger class of absentee mail-in ballots could be thrown out - all the absentee ballots in Fulton County, for instance.
At least one federal judge has already rejected that idea. In dismissing a lawsuit brought by the attorney Lin Wood, Judge Steven Grimberg in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia noted that the suit wanted "over one million absentee ballots called into question" and that such "requested relief could disenfranchise a substantial portion of the electorate and erode the public’s confidence in the electoral process.""
I am this person and I fell asleep at the computer last night... GA did check signatures twice as part of the normal part of the election process - once when requesting a mail-in ballot and when the mail-in ballot is returned. In the case of an online ballot request, the voter had to supply their driver's license as part of their request. The driver's license record contains their signature. I personally think the only strange part of this portal request is that they allow the voter to specify where to send the ballot, which to me conflates mail-in ballot with absentee ballots. I think they should have different requirements/procedures. Mail-in ballots should only be sent to the address of record on the voter registration, in my opinion. But to your point about the online ballot request not having a signature verification - that is false. They use the DMV signature and/or the voter registration signatures to make a match, if a match was not made with them, the cure process kicked in and the voter was notified per the contact details on the voter registration.
The absentee ballot request portal was not part of the settlement agreement with the Dems (https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/41/2020/03/GA-Settlement-1.pdf) - that simply addressed the mail-in ballot rejection process. Signature matching is somewhat subjective. It says that all known signatures will be used to make a match and that 2/3 people are needed to reject it. Someone can't reject ballots by themselves and then they have to sign the ballot and write why it was rejected. Then, they have to notify the voter to give them a chance to come down and rectify the ballot. This agreement was entered into as a settlement to a court case and under the supervision of a judge, who accepted the agreement. As this was a decision about how to conduct the election, the Election Board was acting within the responsibilities that was granted to it by the State Legislature.
Oh you mean the DMV signatures that are stored at a lower “pixel” (it’s not pixels but something similar to that) count than the Dominion machine can accurately match?