That is not the problem. One side wants to claim fraud wheres theres none. Suppress legal votes. Claim legal ballots are illegal. You assume everything is done equal when its not. You say if the signature is off they should tell you to leave. Barring that a person with zero handwriting analysis ability is not qualified to make that call what happens when you present your ID and sign your name and nothing is wrong and they still tell you to leave.

When that happens that should be prosecuted - the solution is not to change the rules to favour the other side. "anything you can cheat, we can cheat better" to misquote a song.

The rules are not changed to favor a side. Ideally they are improved to allow legal voters to cast a legal vote without having their rights taken away. Look at Jim Crow they designed a test under the guise of voter integrity that said if you can read you can vote. But what the test really did is said if you are black you cannot vote. This was considered legal not cheating. If you just say you cant remove that law it benefits liberals that's pretty screwed up.

My bias is maximum legal voter participation. If you are a citizen laws should not be designed to take your suffrage rights away.

Oh. Is that your only bias? - your bias is all over your name - not a dig at Powell?, your attributing to Trump contractor irregularities in the wall, your approval of the election of a man who did not campaign, who in practical terms has done huge harm to minorities, I could go on. The funny thing for me is that n 2016 I did not understand how the USA could have elected such a buffoon as I believed Trump to be. I have come to doubt that perspective because of the blatant bad faith and lack of self-awareness of those who cannot stand him.

Powell is a lunatic that believed in a massive conspiracy involving the CIA, Clinton foundation, hugo chavez, China, Iran, Cuba, Venezuela, Biden, Bernie Sanders because why not, soros because you need a rich Jew, several different voting machines companies, communist money. She refused to provide a shred of evidence and said wait until you see the court case. She then expanded her claims to include charging far right Governor Kemp and those below him of capital crimes and working to rig the election. She provided again no evidence to back these serious criminal accusations.

When she filed her cases the entire conspiracy was based on shoddy technical work from so called experts that do not have the experience required to mount a case or were 3rd party. The primary witness which literally was the glue holding the crazy together had the least credible evidence and is likely facing perjury charges getting caught lying about the very experience used to claim credibility. Anyone that values the truth should desire seeing these travesties struck down in courts like the sad excuse for legal work they are.

Thanks for demonstrating your lack of bias. May I suggest camomile for your insomnia. I do love talking and funnily enough I think we could have a drink and some decent banter if we did not live thousands of miles apart, but I do have a day to get on with and I think you do need some sleep. I may check in again tomorrow. Over and out...

I am 100% biased against anyone that believes QAnon. If they can provide any proof that Democrats are pedophile baby eating literal demons and only a trump using Q level government clearance to fight against them and stopping covid a partisan viral weapon aimed at infecting Republicans I'd be interested in seeing it...failing that I see no reason give them the time of day or pretend they should be practicing law or being in Congress. They may complain and pretend all opinions are equal and they should be taken seriously but they should not.

If you would like to pretend that all Trump supporters believe QAnon that would be a falsehood.

Well, this is an interesting first message to join the server to.

Welcome! @SoonMrWick

https://youtu.be/K_SNEoxfwmg

Chairman wow.

If this doesn't upload correctly, heres a google archive link https://archive.is/jKb5m for "Stopping The Coup: The ~~Election~~ Disruption Guide For 2020"

Interesting to consider this guide for potential/veiled/proven impact before, during, and after the election (regardless of which candidate wins)

@SoonMrWick all paths lead to civil conflict?

Yes, IMO.

It's actually quite obvious.,.

Win win ...

For the wealthy

Financial collapse

Yeah, I'm also curious at what point is it that Democrat leadership, allowing Antifa/BLM (violent elements of) to operate in their city against the Police/DA/ or even the revolving door $0 bail courts

How many days does that need to go on until it demonstrates the government + media complicity through silence or inaction. Antifa "idea", "fiery but mostly peaceful" etc.

Seems like the inevitable civil contact is simply being allowed to build their communication networks unimpeded if not supported. And allows for several tactical failures against police with little to not consequence, even going so far as bail fundraising.

Riot clips time stamped https://fukkot.com/riots/all/

@SoonMrWick, you just advanced to level 3!

The reporter who was stood in front of burning buildings with “Fiery but mostly peaceful” on the screen 🙈🙈 Gaslighting on another level. Antifa / BLM are highly organised and well funded. 😠

@Beth did JJ say that he is acquainted with Miss Maxwell?

I’ve not long woke up.. JJ?

I don't know jj either

Lol

@Beth c ?

Auntie@Beth

One of the loudest victims / activists of Maxwell. https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia?s=09

I don’t understand code in the morning flower 🌸

@Beth it's not even cuz I can't figure it out maybe

Auntie Beth has a slight headache, one shouldn’t drink 🙈

Right..

Good on Virginia!

@Beth check msg...

Uhhh

Code

I follow you now @busillis it wouldn’t surprise me. He does my head in, badly 😂 #code

@SoonMrWick can't pull it off like Mr Marx