@Dedkraken really it looks like her.

No ad homs.

Her story dramatically evolved from her sworn affidavit after the election and her testimony with Giuliani that’s what the final question was about

He keeps spamming drunk pictures

She looked at qanon videos for months and added all of it to what she claims she saw

Dedkraken had interesting info

Agreed, @busillis You only need to link pictures once to make a point.

At least remove the embeds (if possible) on follow-up references.

Or just link to a prior message.

3 images take up 100% of the screen.

On my 1080p monitor.

When Fox News interviewed her and looked at her affidavit months prior all she saw was 1 -a mystery van whose contents she never saw and 2- she did not know how ballots which caused an error were corrected. Everything else was said off the record before MI Congress but was not in her affidavit

How about this I'll bet you $50 Trump is it going to be president....

Autocorrect is trying to steal your money.

@Maw easy come easy go baby.

lol

Usd

? I don't think he is but he's still fighting for it so it's not out of the possibility he will be. I believe there's fraud, but no institutional support to investigate it.

Only if it's legal to make bets in your respective state(s)*

So idk what you would be betting

@Maw I'm in a state where gambling is legal....

I'm betting Trump ain't going to win.

Lots of institutions have investigated though, it's primarily through state-level though.

GBI for instance.

I'm pretty sure if a republican Governor could have proved fraud they would have.

Or any politically elected Republican.

not really

Especially GA and kemp

GA literally had the GBI investigate.

why would that be?

kemp has massive trade port and investment from china

it's not like insider trading and selling america out is strictly a dem thing

Therefore he is somehow capable of rigging an election in hundreds, if not thousands of precincts? Or did for that matter? Or that the GBI is somehow CCP-shills too?

Or all the elections staff?

Is this some extreme guilt by association?

No. The pattern is high amounts of adjudications, mail in ballots with resistance to signature audits. In particular GA promised to publish ballot images but now refuses to do so.

Do you have proof of that?

So the required bipartisan team on adjudications, which kinda have been confirmed are pretty spectacularly accurate, of hundreds of precincts are somehow poisoned?

I'm pretty sure I know why this is.

FY20-Annual-Container-Trade.pdf Port of Savannah.

What’s the goal of so called “signature audits”?