Message from @el pebble
Discord ID: 795342067772424213
And look what it is now
Poverty .. famines..
Ye its all the white mens fold
profit-sharing didn’t happen, land reform didn’t happen, pension boosts didn’t happen
Thats what I vote 100%!
the wehrmacht remained
I wasn't trying to say that, I am saying that people left to their own devices can have what is the `black wallstreet` or they can have what is a never ending civil war
usury was permitted
mass privatization
definitely wasn’t freedom of religion lmfao
nazi germany was down religious freedoms throat as hard as the bolsheviks
Unified German speaking peoples, especially through reclamation of territory.
Defied the treaty. Justifiably.
Took more land. Only Germans can be citizens, though there was a whole sequence of determining who was German. They had laws for foreigners.
Not sure about 6 or 7, the part about expulsion. But the government did create programs for work in exchange for bonds. It worked fairly well. Unsure about 8.
Citizens, Germans, had equal rights. 12 is specifically concerning world War 1. Though after the inflation the profits were worthless.
The government controlled public industries.
Unsure of 14-19. The law was reformed.
21 don't know if sport was a law but it became much more widespread.
22. I don't know if the army was changed.
23 was accomplished.
24 was technically accomplished but there weren't any such foreigners in Germany anyway.
25 was accomplished.
Not 100 percent success, not a failure that was just ignored.
I fail to see how 1930s germany is current happenings
most of the points are generic and in line with a party that wants to racially aggrandize support and authority, meaningless to me. what i am talking about are the obvious points where the nsdap is required to vanguard populist economic policies - you know the very points feder helped draft to get votes (he helped draft 15 more points which hitler said no to). The very points that were used to scapegoat antipodal economic activities to the volk (usury, private concentration of profit and capital, high taxes, rural land monopolism) never even went under consideration.
because feder made junckers and industrialists nervous, and as soon as his rhetoric got them their power he was thrown under the bus in ‘33
That's not relevant to whether they were carried out or not. I didn't ask for. Contextual opinions.
the bulk of the national socialists party’s goals were not met or aimed for
Most were met.
unless the only point of the party is to run a ponzi republic of white people
The point of the party was to return Germany to a prior state.
it most certainly wasn’t
they weren’t reactionaries
Returning to a prior state doesn't need to be a reaction.
that’s quite literally all there is
you gonna return it to the kaiser
or the munich communists
They wanted to undo the treaty, reclaim territory, and establish an explicitly German identity.
this isn’t status quo ante by many measure
And?
It's not an all or nothing gamble.
Salvage what you can of what Germany was, then you move on.
the point is they were not only not salvaging they were actively working against the interests of ‘salvage and move on’
feder was the guy who said salvage and move on
look at what happened to him
top party member banished to studies and undersecretary work
They reclaimed territory, their identity, and their economy. I don't care why or through what means. That was the intent and it was accomplished.
they reclaimed territory momentarily, they distorted the various cultural artifacts that made up germany and their economy was a powerhouse.... if you just look at heavy industry for the military
truth is most germans didn’t stop rationing clothes or food
plenty lived on site during the public works projects