Okay be civil

Bigger families is ideal, but the fact is labor is devalued (due to women workers as well as immigration and other things). Not everyone can afford stay at home le trad Murdoch Chan waifu meme.

We do have to work with our current circumstances and slowly but steadily transition back to the traditional family standard

@DeusVult disagreement is fine but I think it is a bit rude to jump to "so you have daddy issues?"

And it’s still entirely beneficial for older women with children out of the home to pursue nursing and care taking positions which do require higher level education

@Wood-Ape - OK/MN Well beating around the bush is not really my thing.... I will make sure I censor myself so I don't hurt any feelings.

There are still several fields where men are not naturally compatible to be in that women have to fill.

I wouldn’t say you hurt my feelings it just wasn’t a productive assumption

@NITRODUBS And I would say promoting women in any field OTHER THAN MOTHERHOOD is the least productive assumption I've ever heard. Considering we all should know (((who))) promotes this and why they promote it.

Women have always held a majority of care taking positions

In practically every civilization

Yeah in tribes where the mothers all raise the children and take care of the village as a large home unit..... Modern nursing and medical care is post (((industrial revolution)))

We need manual laborers, engineers, etc, things that men are meant to do. But we also need caretakers, which is what women have always done

@DeusVult reading
"for reasons of economic reality as well as women's suitability in various fields, some women should still get professional training while we encourage and increase the number of stay at home mothers" as "hey you have issues" is as retarded as when anti-whites try to pathologize white solidarity as "fragility" or being jealous of blacks. It is a baseless assumption.

Yes MOTHERHOOD

But it isn’t and that’s actually incorrect

It makes sense to put people in jobs they're already biologically built to do

Do you think hospitals didn’t exist before the industrial revolution?

I’m also not saying these are positions that specifically women of child bearing age should be doing

As I said previously, after children are outside of the house pursuing their own endeavors/families/etc it would be productive for women to go into other care taking positions

Of course not but women who did that work had already had children and raised families.... No 25 yo woman in the past would choose that over motherhood

Refer to what I just said

And if you're J posting, know that pathologizing at any (or no) hint of your preferred conclusion is their favorite tactic. @DeusVult

And telling me that my position is somehow related to the jewish agenda is kinda.. not helping your argument. You’re signaling

Traditional marriages are also the most successful don't forget

@NITRODUBS @Wood-Ape - OK/MN Okay guys have fun in the echo chamber!

Mad Online(tm)

I've been there before.

And this concludes that women’s biology tends to give them better verbal skills.

Notice the infighting occurs only when a different opinion appears....

Infighting?

You said my statement was retarded @Wood-Ape - OK/MN

Nitro came up with a nuanced amd ultimately pro birth rate idea.

So anyway I was watching Project Bluebook last night

Great show

Apparently if I don't agree with you I'm retarded...

Because it wasn’t productive and you’re not offering any ideas, you’re just trying to relate my points to Jewish ideals. You haven’t really offered any sort of solutions as to what should happen to care taking positions, you just said “but motherhood!”

It takes place in the 1950’s and is about UFOs

It’s finally starting to get juicy

And I’m recommending this and I don’t even usually watch television