Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 569376685053706261
Tomorrow is gonna be awful, I just know it.
Look what you've done, John.
People like the p17 single shot for the trigger, cost, hand pump and consistency
dorohedoro is so fucking great
I couldn't follow it, it might have been because I was drinking heavily at the time.
And the art style is confusing
Rapid target reacquisition is something I want to work on, so I'd want a semi-automatic with blowback.
the art style is my favorite part
I like it in single frames but it's just too messy for me.
nothing has that style of the year 2000 grunge
Like I dropped it in a copy room that was never swept so there's black toner everywhere
How much do I have to spend to get something capable of Popping faggoty rabbits like Ted's Holdover
Humanely, about 850 FPS for .177 and like 650 for .22
It's a 1.5 action, I'm not fighting you about this.
I mean, I understand that air pistols work differently than real pistols, so I'm not trying to argue? It's just funny that it says how authentic it is to the real thing, then the next bullet point demolishes that
Clit-safeties are pig disgusting anyway
The next bullet point is accurate tho, glocks have the striker captive and you pull it the rest of the way. Not quite double action but not single action either.
My friend offered to let me borrow his Ruger LCP subcompact to see if I liked carrying it, but I declined. I don't like not being able to see/decock the hammer
Why would you need to decock the hammer ever?
Just clear it and call it a day
Because decocking a hammer is faster than
>remove magazine
>rack slide
>pocket loose bullet
>reinsert magazine
literally 100% of the time?
Don't be dense, John.
My Bersa has an integrated Decocker, firing pin block, and trigger disconnect in one safety, so I carry it chambered, hammer down, and safety on
This sounds like you are compensating for a disregard of gun saftey.
🤔
I think carrying a gun chambered, hammer back, and relying on a simple safety, like a 1911 or similar, to be much less safe than having a gun literally incapable of firing in 3 different ways, John
Unless you have a shitty nylon or really thin leather holster it's not a consideration or if it is the trigger is sufficiently heavy enough to deal with people who just put guns without holsters into thier pocket or purse
Yeah, I agree. But when it's a literal gun, better safe than sorry. "It won't because I'm not stupid" doesn't cut it
Safeties get flicked off and then your back to the 'unsafe' condition which isn't a concern. And hammer blocks are standard since like the early 50s
No gun unless it's something like a prerecall sig is going to go off my itself if you drop it
When I say "decocking the hammer", I don't mean doing the "hold the hammer back with your thumb, pull the trigger, and slowly ride that hammer forward". That shit is asking for trouble. Used to do that with my 1911. Never had a mistake doing it, but the potential for mistakes was (eventually) enough to dissuade me from doing it ever again
I'm not arguing 1911s, hence why I said 50s and not 1911
Your concerns about the LCP are dumb
I mean, I have other concerns besides it having a different form of safety than I'm used to.
It's Handlet-sized (Obviously), which makes it harder for an ogre like myself to manipulate it, it has less capacity (obviously), and since it's polymer the recoil would be greater.
The trigger is like 8 pounds and a full inch you aren't accidently pulling that unless, again you don't even have a trigger holster.
Oh, you're a fudd, I forgor
I suppose I am. But I'm slowly coming around. Much of my criticisms stem from poorfaggotry