Message from @Tervy
Discord ID: 543077217954037770
but apparently thats pretty much copy and paste from AMDs own benchmarks
so realworld tests still keep us waiting
Link to article?
Is it possible to determine, when a LUKS encrypted system has been successfully decrypted and booted the last time, if you are unable to decrypt it yourself?
The question in essence is: if you have two encrypted Linux systems installed on two SSDs and you are asked to hand over the decryption keys by the authorities, can you give the password of one of them to the authorities, and plausibly deny to remember the other one because "its an old system that I haven't used in a long time"?
as long as all log files are within encrypted container.. i doubt ?
mm actualy probly depens on system
if Grub2/uefi/whateverbootmanager is a snitch and keeps logs
then yes @Deleted User
but boot managereless login ??should not ?? write logs to anywhere but inside the containers once you have given password
but if you need such deniability, you better of using something else than luks
such scenarios are when the "destroy on password2" bundled with "destroy if copied" step in
later needing quite bit tinkering with the controller board of hdd
this is why you never store anything of negative value on your computers
I am not storing anything that incriminating but wouldn't that be even less plausible to deny?
They can inspect the broken hard drive and figure out
yes but they would not have any proof
only that you had such setup there
And that you deliberately gave password 2 which hindered investigations
Which would bring you right into even more trouble
not really no
or 1234
or your wifes name
when they try to passguess they end up destroying it themself
you had nothing to do with it at that point
as always you have right to be silent
and you should use that right
also right to drink,wc,lawyer up fast as possible
you should know this by now :3
everything you say can be and WILL BE used AGAINST you.
I don't understand how that can be less incriminating than partially collaborating and saying that you forgot the old one because you never used it
cause if/when they do get inside
its clear you lied
and your punishment will be more severe
speaking can only make your situation worse
unless the case is clear and you are snitching to lessen your own load
and even then you can confim your guiltyness to other stuff "being there" if you tell them about stuff you saw
what can be additionaly blamed on you too as you were part of it there
you will always lose if you talk
same as the rule "never let police search/come in/anything withotu warrant"