Message from @Droidbot

Discord ID: 606380302859763763


2019-07-28 19:07:01 UTC  

used 970s are like $70

2019-07-28 19:07:47 UTC  

generally speaking nvidia's generations scale one model number up, so 1050 ~= 960

2019-07-28 19:08:18 UTC  

🇨🇦 BTW

2019-07-28 19:08:23 UTC  

This AMD card is on sale right now

2019-07-28 19:09:59 UTC  
2019-07-28 19:10:11 UTC  

still not bad price tbh

2019-07-29 00:13:39 UTC  

@basker anything amd 4xx or 5xx go used

2019-07-29 00:13:48 UTC  

mining cards flooded the market and prices hit the floor

2019-07-29 00:14:11 UTC  

yeah im thinking a 1660

2019-07-29 00:14:27 UTC  

1660 is surprisingly good

2019-07-29 17:47:30 UTC  

Report from the dutch government on microsoft telemetry

2019-07-29 20:01:57 UTC  

j u s t w a i t

2019-08-01 05:18:40 UTC  

Good read @Goz3rr

2019-08-01 06:41:15 UTC  

also things i forgot to link here : <https://www.fxtec.com/product/fxtec-pro1-pre-order/>

2019-08-01 06:58:37 UTC  

@Tervy under graphics they claim it can do AAA class gaming

2019-08-01 06:58:50 UTC  

it's a low power dual core

2019-08-01 06:58:52 UTC  

😂

2019-08-01 07:00:42 UTC  

It can maybe run games that are ported from switch but with slower GPU and about the same CPU horsepower it'd be a stretch

2019-08-01 07:02:38 UTC  

the Y series are great daily chips, I do nearly everything on mine (from ff/chrome to Photoshop to Premiere with low bitrate video) but they're not powerhouses by any means, lying chinks

2019-08-01 08:38:24 UTC  

tbh idk, I had a Surface 4 Pro m3 and damn was it slow

2019-08-01 08:39:02 UTC  

Even for browsing with Vivaldi (because Chrome kept dying due to the 4GB of ram) it was a major hassle as soon as I opened more than 5 tabs

2019-08-01 08:40:39 UTC  

vivaldi is effectively chrome tho

2019-08-01 08:40:51 UTC  

so you just changed bad to bad <:alithink:327930371796893698>

2019-08-01 08:41:03 UTC  

I wanted Chrome but Chrome vanilla wouldn't run

2019-08-01 08:41:24 UTC  

Vivaldi is actually *small footprint* Chromium

2019-08-01 08:41:43 UTC  

It tries to do a decent job at it, and by default for most people I guess it's good enough

2019-08-01 08:42:00 UTC  

It does neat things like putting tabs to sleep when you are almost hitting the RAM limit

2019-08-01 08:42:05 UTC  

(without using any extension)

2019-08-01 08:42:16 UTC  

And overall got a lower CPU footprint

2019-08-01 08:42:23 UTC  

But it's usually at the cost of speed

2019-08-01 08:42:42 UTC  

+ fully compatible with Chrome extensions as a result

2019-08-01 08:44:43 UTC  

as i said effectively chrome

2019-08-01 08:46:04 UTC  

It's still better than Chrome vanilla while retaining some features from it is what I wanted to say

2019-08-01 08:46:13 UTC  

But even with that it was bad

2019-08-01 08:47:49 UTC  

sadly most of that can be blamed on web pages itself

2019-08-01 08:47:52 UTC  

not the browsers