***(not the first time ive thought of this either, but..) yeah.. sighs .. ---this must be why a lot of people are "still what they are" ..becasue ..they dont WATCH//LISTEN (load//play ) to the "VIDS" we all show them : /

such as great Flat Earth stuff, and ...stuff like this here too with Creation and stuffs

@✧Mike Flatbird (Mike Blackbird)✧ i agreed to watch it its just 2 hours long and my teachers bully me with projects

Im 6 minutes in. So far I agree

https://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/09/lucy-facts-on-early-human-ancestor/ awe man, I still have this issue of nat geographic lying around somewhere

9:40 sudden change "sudden change. overnight, homos appear." Not really what we are saying kinda close to the opposite of what we want to say

I was in middle school when I read about it

oh he was overexaggerating alot apparently

I agree with what he is saying and we kinda our being manipulated in the sense that just because we find a primape fossil doesn't mean it gave rise to us. That is a common misconception they do advertise. Its not fake though as he says. Fossils are legitament. But most of them are most plausibly not in a monophyletic group from a recent ancestor scientifically speaking. And this is a common scientific misconception supported by companies and stuff saying like "our ancestor" when really we don't have the link but a paraphyletic species that is primeape but most likely branched off completely before. Unless they can get DNA or cytochrome C data which I highly would doubt then yeah they aren't really closely related: we just can't confirm it. Unless we had thousands of diversified primeape fossils homologous structure wouldn't work accurately

the other arguement that would be recieved by this is people who support puncutated equillibrium which means evolution happens very rapidly (most support a mix of both). Most likely not likely in a k selective species (basically big mammal type creature) because we have few offspring, live long, time before reproductive age is long, generally makes it impossible for a species to evolve fast. Though k pod orcas are in debate actually for a new species so I don't know

*mix of both includes gradualism-self explanatory

12:48 our bones were stronger undeniably before because switching to agriculture was bad at first and through historical records undeniably caused worse conditions. Of course we rebounded eventually to today but it wouldn't probably be enough time or nearly as advantagous to gain our height back as a global population

switching to civilization was a switch that happened rapidly, humans cannot evolve over the course of a few millenia

I should probably leave before I poke the hive

Well they did when the weak or the actually strong in this case literally died because they couldn't get enough food and most food became non meat which lacks certain amino acids we need to ingest and yeah. It was punctuated equillibrium there because we actually had the traits.

so they evolved by killing all the strong and tall alleles out of the genepool and the weak and short were all we were left with. Natural selection at its finest: geneecide solution is prefered in general if you want to think of it like that. We were literally dying

And this is why we don't like natural selection in our world: letting mass killing happen isn't that great

'ok im at 40 and im gonna stop for the night and agree with him up to the bigfoot part. But i will make 2 claims. 1 Sasquatch/Bigfoot in the US is not from primeape evolution and by that therefore not real (Atleast its legend form). Think about it. There's no way the creatures moved all the way from Africa to Eastern Asia, across a field like land bridge (where they couldnt travel because humans would have attacked them out if they did according to the theory) and established in the US without problems and found a food source. also US not announcing it from clear satellite pictures when we'd love to strike fear in our country's mind because fear creates easy control and the us government would gain support and the people would gain morale (even despite this). If you think about that. 2 It would make no sense for one of the weird nonappreciated variants to have been in both African and South American Jungles; Primeape evolution started way too late for this to happen. So although reports from visitors may be the same, one of these report sets has to be false. And yes it could be transported illegally but a the amount of cover up needed b the african jungles and south american jungles are very different c food supply? Nothing would be similar enough will allowing the homonoid (or whatever) to stay concealed.

@Darkly SteamGear you believe national geograpic ? 😆

and..
--heheh... you prolly _LOVE_ >>wikipedia webpages too,, lmao at u...........

*nonappreciated i mean little known about or recognized about.

@the21cat u believe all fossils 😆

and, Lucy too, right x D
**aptly named ^
for..
luciferrr...... dert da'derr <:uh_duhh:583617741684998154>

the person in the video does

and yeah i have a fern fossil. so yes

Also he discredits paleontology which is good because it kinda deserves that with people being bad

He just doesn

i didnt even read that whole thihng yet

i see nuttin butta whole lotta words tho...

't disbelieve fossils

i see ya brought up bigfoot and a couple other things,, hey ..i said from the beginning every time i posted it,, i says >> " Take some of it with a PINCH OF SALT"

ok fair point

What i actually think happened though is they migrated to the jungles and mountains like he said but they died eventually from a mix of prehumans (actual ones not what we label as pre) going there (in the outside) mixed with not being able to adapt because the amount of evolution needed was too much. So pretty good considering the extremism later in the video. I will see what he has to say though and finish it tomorrow.

u say "prehumans" ,, but do not say what 'kind' ......

nor will be able to 😆

whatever they would be

probably non microevolved us'es

--Smh.......

u silly.......................

Why do things exist instead of not existing

God

If god was god is god than god?