Message from @CabbageEater123

Discord ID: 577101326845083668


2019-05-11 21:26:52 UTC  

the whole fear being observed here is part of hegelian dialect (problem-reaction-solution)

2019-05-11 21:27:00 UTC  

manufacturing of consent becomes clear

2019-05-11 23:55:03 UTC  

@I hate sand 90% before vaccines were developed. It was still dropping. Only like 70% of ppl are vaccinated with 7 series. Where is all the deaths?

2019-05-12 01:30:47 UTC  

better nutrition plumbing and sanitation got rid of diseases not your vaccines

2019-05-12 01:50:22 UTC  

Threaten my kin with a syringe and ill ask questions right after I end ya

2019-05-12 06:16:01 UTC  

yalls opanions on vaccines

2019-05-12 08:12:57 UTC  

Kids, I can give a LONG HISTORY OF DEATHS due to diseases that people werebt vaccinated against,
Polio
Measles
The black death

2019-05-12 08:13:04 UTC  

Theres probs more

2019-05-12 08:13:10 UTC  

Lemme google it

2019-05-12 08:19:11 UTC  

Malaria[7]
Meningococcal disease
Mumps
Pneumococcal disease
Pertussis
Poliomyelitis
Rabies

2019-05-12 08:19:20 UTC  

Anthrax[8]
Plague
Q fever
Smallpox

2019-05-12 08:20:56 UTC  

If you are to say vaccines are harmful, show me a SCIENTIFIC SOURCE STATING WHY and not karens health blog.

2019-05-12 11:17:56 UTC  

problem: not all of these diseases had vaccines for them, not limited to the black death and Q fever. Plague too

2019-05-12 11:18:28 UTC  

you also tend to use the name of science. Clearly observable that you weaponize the word science

2019-05-12 11:19:09 UTC  

when claiming having the word science, you can call anyone not believing you 'anti-science'. Which is a fallacious tactic based on ad hominem, rather than a good argument

2019-05-12 11:40:12 UTC  

jesus dude

2019-05-12 11:40:36 UTC  

science tells u alot of things

2019-05-12 11:54:38 UTC  

It's not even subjective. Vaccines are necessary. You antivaxxers are just searching for attention and and early grave

2019-05-12 12:22:18 UTC  

what are you ignorant people talkinga about -- and hey do yous not read? must i , (myself, my personal opinion) be stated every few days,, and ..must i post the SAME link or INFO every few days?

2019-05-12 12:25:09 UTC  

-- me, ...idk ..perhaps maybe the common 5 or 6 , i dont have a problem with -- yeah ..those same 5 or 6 that were given when i was a baby/kid, a while ago. like measels, mump, smallpox, chicken pox, etc.
but eh? DO YOU KNOW **Children today receive more than 12 times as many vaccine doses than in 1940** https://www.naturalnews.com/040042_vaccine_schedule_immunizations_children.html

2019-05-12 12:25:33 UTC  

do you know, the SHITTTTTTTTTTTTTTT THEY PUT IN THEM NOWWWWWWWW

2019-05-12 12:25:46 UTC  

DO YOU KNOWWWWWWWWWWW none of them other ones are neededddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd

2019-05-12 12:27:21 UTC  

DO YOU KNOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW there are TOO MANY now, that, they cannot have the capacity, smarts, know-how etc, to test WHICH ONES and the COMBINATIONS of whihc, ...cause 'problems' ..between WHICH 'peopleeeeeeee' -- i hope you understand that statement

2019-05-12 12:27:39 UTC  

.
THERE IS NOTHING TO REFUTEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

2019-05-12 12:27:45 UTC  

YOUs are IGNORANT

2019-05-12 12:28:27 UTC  

you too! @WARDLE#2299 mr um "works in the medical field" SMFH at u ,

2019-05-12 12:28:31 UTC  

he left

2019-05-12 12:28:59 UTC  

.
ANYONE ELSE wanna refute/rebut what i said here? and make yourself look stupid? PLEASEEEEEEEEE come refute it

2019-05-12 12:29:05 UTC  

g ndkbanjbkifvgnjrao bnvg lokfasznjoibvfigaz njbnolkjlgf\

2019-05-12 12:29:06 UTC  

g mbfoijsdnlg;fasn

2019-05-12 12:31:03 UTC  

2019-05-12 12:43:30 UTC  

`problem: not all of these diseases had vaccines for them, not limited to the black death and Q fever. Plague too` Sure, the common cold doesn't have a vaccine. That's because it mutates too frequently. Science is still finding the best way to protect humans against diseases.

`you also tend to use the name of science. Clearly observable that you weaponize the word science
when claiming having the word science, you can call anyone not believing you 'anti-science'. Which is a fallacious tactic based on ad hominem, rather than a good argument` https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiscience It is a real thing which means they stand against the principles of science (observation & hypothesis testing) as well as the scientific method. You can show me NaturalNews, which admit themselves they are against the principles of science and the scientific community [aka they are anti-science], but anti-vaxxers still can't explain using facts and actual biological vocabulary to describe the alleged negative effects of vaccines.

2019-05-12 12:43:43 UTC  
2019-05-12 12:44:41 UTC  

wikipedia isn't 100% reliable, therefore I'd give you a different source: https://www.corbettreport.com/the-weaponization-of-science/

2019-05-12 12:46:41 UTC  

is corbett report reliable

2019-05-12 12:46:44 UTC  

and even peer review isn't 100% of the time effective, as it's already demonstrated that there's a lot of influence on it

2019-05-12 12:46:46 UTC  

answer: no