Space weapons gonna take most of us out in the next couple thousand days

https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-05-27-corporate-media-accidentally-admits-higher-co2-levels-planet-earth.html

American Geophysical Union (AGU) claims that, if something isn’t done now to reverse this alleged disastrous trend towards apparent planetary CO2 suffocation, total human CO2 emissions “could match those of Earth’s last major greenhouse warming event” – which AGU says occurred during the “Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum” period roughly 56 million years ago.

But wait: What would have caused CO2 levels to reach epic proportions 56 million years ago before humans were even in the picture? AGU doesn’t say, nor does it address the fact that 56 million years ago, there were no vehicles around to burn fossil fuels, either. In other words, something else was the cause of CO2 levels supposedly rising to “dangerous” levels at that time, which further implies that the so-called “greenhouse gases” that are causing today’s Leftists to experience climate anxiety are in no way man-made or man-initiated

http://humansarefree.com/2016/11/the-97-of-scientists-agree-on-climate.html

so 75 scientist make up the 97% HAHAHAHA

@Wretch You know that the reason we have fossil fuels now is because the CO2 in the air FROM 56 million years ago compacted into rocks.....

the amount of carbon on earth hasnt changed

the amount of CO2 has fluctuated, it does this naturally, but has been amplified by human activity

<:CHECK6:403540120181145611> <@!547450864646881303> has been warned
```
reason: Bad word usage
```

@McCloud#1815 75 scientist makes up the 97% is a problem cause it is not 97% and the climate change is bull shit the only reason the climates have changed is called the four seasons

hahahaha figures he has aborted the building

nice story but there is no fossil fuel that is bs too. no proof of dinosaurs ever. not one dinosaur bone ws found till the 1800s. that tell me it is a made up thing to push this kind of hoax and fearmongering they can push with this idea and how it can be manipulated to their advantage for purposes of control and money !!! which is controlling you btw money!!!!

It wasn't discovered until modern times; therefore, it's fake.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-7038685/amp/Climate-change-revive-plague-LA-helping-rat-populations-thrive-experts-warn.html

Climate change wont bring plague to LA.
The dirty liberal policies already did that. Now they are trying to blame it on climate change. LA has always been warm.

"Co2 is good" WHAT THE FRICK @Citizen Z

Yes

@Hirohito's chins

Very good

I want 50% more co2

Water is good too but you can still drown in it

Not if precipitation is 100%

@BurgessShale

Can you survive if precipitation is 100?

Now ask yourself this

What happens if co2 rises 50% from current levels of .04% to .06%?

Give me the scientific answer that is backed up by the scientific method.

Nobody knows or cares what you’re talking about

>>ban 586121305984598041

<:vSuccess:390202497827864597> Successfully banned <@586121305984598041>

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-7107857/Have-reached-solar-minimum-sun-without-spots-16-consecutive-days.html

The spots were just dirty lenses

😂

@Citizen Z i cant tell if youre being serious

Nah, he's not.

You can see sunspots with the naked eye if you have those heavy-duty glasses.

no not about that, about that he wants more co2 lol

Yes im serious.

can i ask why? or will you ban/mute me for not agreeing with you?

Why would you want to get rid of co2? You dont like forests? You hate trees and want them to grow slow and be unhealthy? You want plants to be disease ridden and not be tolerant to droughts? You want more deserts? @Hirohito's chins