Have you heard of Cell Salts?

Go right ahead

A brief explaination and then I will go get the information.
Every Astrological sign is naturally deficient in a certain cell salt. Interestingly enough, there are 12 main salts and 12 signs in the Tropical zodiac.
You're not only naturally deficient in a single salt, but 3. Your main sign and the next two that directly follow.

What evidence do you have for this?

Why would I believe you?

I'm working on that. Do you expect immediate understanding of Astrology?

Let me know when you've got evidence, then.

Keep an eye out

This is kinda stupid

https://ascensionglossary.com/index.php/Biochemic_Cell_Salts

Only because you don't understand it

Assertions are not evidence.

I could make a statement about literally anything. For people to have any reason to believe you, I suggest you provide them with evidence.

I just provided a link for you to read. That's just an introduction.

There's no evidence in this link. It's just a bunch of assertions.

Are you going to do any bit of work for this or are you going to expect me to spoonfeed you every damn detail?

I'm expecting you to have evidence. I can provide you with evidence for every one of my beliefs.

Why can't you for yours?

You can't do that with one single link

Your expectations are absurd and ludicrous.

No, your link had no evidence in it. I suggest you send one that has some!

Not to mention unrealistic.

Are you listening?

It's unrealistic for me to expect a single piece of evidence when you're expecting me to believe something?

You can't understand Astrology with a single link or two. This is extremely detailed shit and your expectations are outrageous. I'm asking a question and giving you an introduction to the concept. What are you not understanding?

Again, I'm asking for any evidence, at all.

I even said I would get **information**, not **evidence** to start.

I could make similar assertions about anything. Werewolves, even.

Would you read hours and hours of information about flying werewolves? Or would you want evidence first?

I've yet to see any evidence of astrology. If you'd like to convince people, I suggest you give them reason to believe it.

After all, we can't all just believe everything we're told.

You need a basic understanding before you can analyze the evidence. Otherwise, you're going to be asking a lot of questions instead of learning through analysis.

That's how you end up as one of the "sheeple", right? Believing everything you're told?

Fucking Christ, slow the shit down.

Feel free to interject with a single piece of proof or evidence at any time!

I'm very open-minded.

It's not nearly that simple with Astrology. You should probably familiarize yourself with the common vocabulary used and what they mean.

Houses, squares, trines, retrogrades, dignities. Things like that.

So are you suggesting there is no proof?

Not. In the slightest.