um

Sigh

The real topography shows nothing of extreme height

By the way, ***all planets*** are not perfect spheres

```The real topography shows nothing of extreme height```
citation please

God damnit

You know with enough research from credible and reliable and unbiased websites

Like NAT GEO AND NASA.

You can find out yourself

Don't rely on Google IMAGES

cant you see im using Yahoo

i fkn hate ~~google~~

Does it matter what browser you're using

That's your problem

All browsers share the intended goal to give you the resource you need

nat geo? and nasa? <:BigSmiles:556070613224259594> ?? <:lul:484994724118134784>

Well, yes, they are credible

browser? im using Firefox
i said im using YAHOO SEARCH ENGINE

Then again, it does not matter what search engine you're using

dont argue tech with me, kid, ..i work in IT-tech and tech-support, smh at u

Stop leading the conversation else where

all those websites are wrong? that have those pics of geoid earth without water?

Yeah you're proffesion is based on IT tech not geography

Show me YOUR "source" pleae thx

I never said it was wrong, it was simply exaggerated

show me then

show me/us

You easily get influenced by images, give it a second thought, what if it was photos hopped (I didn't say they were photos hopped)

Crap my auto correct

hmm.. NASA . gov https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/1412/geoid2005_champgrace_2362.jpg

hmm gee

need more? or

You're like a little child who get influenced easily by photos, a mere image that can be altered easily by today's technology cannot be a suitable evidence no more

smh at you

I want to ask you flat earthers something

no, -- stick on this topic

Hm

I was gonna go controversial as hell anyway

--where are YOU getting info from, that its "exaggerated" ?? <:BigSmiles:556070613224259594> ??

Yo I'm about to pull out a school project on you

Bruh exaggerated? Really??