Message from @clevebro ☆
Discord ID: 577492745271246888
The actual picture of the earth without water do have lumps and depths like the marina trench as stated as the picture, however it's not as exaggerated as that
If you're a geography student, you'd understand that immediately, but you failed geography the moment you started to believe the flat earth
Furthermore, planets such as Jupiter and Mars do not have water and is not a perfect sphere you thought it'd be
Mars have big 'lumps' such as mountains like Mount Olympus (I'm sure you've heard about this)
http://prntscr.com/nnynwr 🤔 ?? huh??
Jupiter as well
Yes! All the images identified are exaggerated
"geoid earth without water"
um
Sigh
The real topography shows nothing of extreme height
By the way, ***all planets*** are not perfect spheres
```The real topography shows nothing of extreme height```
citation please
God damnit
You know with enough research from credible and reliable and unbiased websites
Like NAT GEO AND NASA.
You can find out yourself
Don't rely on Google IMAGES
cant you see im using Yahoo
i fkn hate ~~google~~
That's your problem
All browsers share the intended goal to give you the resource you need
nat geo? and nasa? <:BigSmiles:556070613224259594> ?? <:lul:484994724118134784>
Well, yes, they are credible
browser? im using Firefox
i said im using YAHOO SEARCH ENGINE
Then again, it does not matter what search engine you're using
dont argue tech with me, kid, ..i work in IT-tech and tech-support, smh at u
Stop leading the conversation else where
all those websites are wrong? that have those pics of geoid earth without water?
Yeah you're proffesion is based on IT tech not geography
Show me YOUR "source" pleae thx
I never said it was wrong, it was simply exaggerated
show me then
show me/us
You easily get influenced by images, give it a second thought, what if it was photos hopped (I didn't say they were photos hopped)
Crap my auto correct
hmm.. NASA . gov https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/1412/geoid2005_champgrace_2362.jpg
hmm gee
need more? or
You're like a little child who get influenced easily by photos, a mere image that can be altered easily by today's technology cannot be a suitable evidence no more