Message from @Human Sheeple

Discord ID: 578230879479005194


2019-05-15 14:39:34 UTC  

FLAT EARTH SHIPS DISAPPEAR HULL FIRST: https://imgur.com/aUtqGyq

2019-05-15 14:39:43 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/564598119590002708/578230033609654273/FlatEarthTheodolite.png

2019-05-15 14:41:22 UTC  

ok god bye @Human Sheeple @L.O.X @Bino <@&486265577829040149> and anyone else, I was muted without being able to respond to a claim

2019-05-15 14:41:31 UTC  

I wanted to have a civil discussion, I was unable to

2019-05-15 14:41:44 UTC  

Derailing isn't civil

2019-05-15 14:42:07 UTC  

ok but I can't give a response to why I am unhappy with your actions in voice

2019-05-15 14:42:18 UTC  

READ

2019-05-15 14:42:19 UTC  

THE

2019-05-15 14:42:19 UTC  

in voice you're able to talk 5 times faster than I can type

2019-05-15 14:42:20 UTC  

PEER

2019-05-15 14:42:22 UTC  

REVIEWED

2019-05-15 14:42:24 UTC  

SCIENCE

2019-05-15 14:42:24 UTC  

so this is unfair

2019-05-15 14:42:26 UTC  

PLEASE

2019-05-15 14:42:37 UTC  

right now I am making an argument against your actions

2019-05-15 14:42:45 UTC  

I understand you're unahppy with criticism towards you

2019-05-15 14:42:53 UTC  

READ

2019-05-15 14:42:54 UTC  

THE

2019-05-15 14:42:55 UTC  

PAPER

2019-05-15 14:42:58 UTC  

but there is valid criticism towards why your actions are unproductive

2019-05-15 14:43:04 UTC  

"In fact, it can be shown that the refraction near the horizon depends mostly on the local temperature gradient, which is much more important than the local temperature itself. For this reason, all the refraction phenomena near the horizon — mirages, dip, terrestrial refraction, etc., as well as the astronomical refraction — are very sensitive to the temperature gradient; and they all vary a great deal more than does the astronomical refraction well up in the sky."
To: "It is obvious that the effect of temperature variation is decisive over the
other atmospheric factors on refraction, to the following proportions: Temperature to humidity to carbon dioxide content to air pressure = 100 : 6 : 2 : 1 "

INVESTIGATION OF REFRACTION
IN THE LOW ATMOSPHERE
By
K. HORV_,.TH
Department of Survey. Technical university. Budapest
(Received Alay 29, 1969)
Presented by Ass. Prof. Dr. F. SAHKOZY
https://aty.sdsu.edu/explain/atmos_refr/astr_refr.html

2019-05-15 14:43:08 UTC  

@Qubit Honestly just read it^

2019-05-15 14:43:14 UTC  

You have to read it before you can criticize it

2019-05-15 14:43:15 UTC  

then you can have a say

2019-05-15 14:43:31 UTC  

ok I'll type this out sinice I am not alloowed to say it

2019-05-15 14:43:46 UTC  

no I am not allowd based on your muting

2019-05-15 14:43:53 UTC  

I was going to ask you questions about the images you posted

2019-05-15 14:43:57 UTC  

which were separate from the paper

2019-05-15 14:44:11 UTC  

@L.O.X I'm leaving

2019-05-15 14:44:17 UTC  

I can't respond to his taunting

2019-05-15 14:44:23 UTC  

@Human Sheeple you're taunting yes

2019-05-15 14:44:31 UTC  

you don't know what questions I have

2019-05-15 14:44:34 UTC  

no, you're wrong

2019-05-15 14:44:37 UTC  

and I can't respond

2019-05-15 14:44:48 UTC  

I'm leaving the server if I'm not allowed to speak

2019-05-15 14:46:52 UTC  

@L.O.X I was muted again

2019-05-15 14:47:18 UTC  

@Human Sheeple I will not speak with you until I am unmuted

2019-05-15 14:48:30 UTC  

@L.O.X have a good deay I'm leaving the server now

2019-05-15 14:48:32 UTC  

@Qubit I will not unmute you until you read the paper

2019-05-15 14:55:15 UTC  

Ha ha would rather QUIT the server than read the paper.