<:CHECK6:403540120181145611> @パートナーキラー has been warned
```
reason: Bad word usage
```

thats where they found the gravity waves liego they found them a long time ago in a glaaxy far far away

oh lol

some genius mfs long time ago

this wins any debate prove mass attracts mass because of their mass

the whole globe rests on a theory

thru dms 😎

so does anything else

Gravity isn't a theory. It's been measured dozens of times. I've said this thousands of times.

Humans are innacurate so basically we are bad

but yeah

gravity isn't a theory

*if mass doesnt attract mass due to mass the whole heliocentric model doesnt work*
^I disagree and that just doesn't fit my approach. All we know regarding "terrestrial gravity" is that freefall occurs within a particular relationship and it points to the center on a round earth, it doesn't depend on a particular value of mass attraction. That is just something extra to debate about to get a further understanding of how things work in our universe.

The spherical earth predates Newton by a long shot

ok but isnt gravty mass attracting mass due to mass

doesnt mass have to attract mass for a sphere earth or for the moon to spin around the earth or us to spin aorund the sun

mass attracting mass is why objects fall to the ground in the globe model id say a lot is riding on the mass attracting mass due to mass thing

No. The spherical earth and Copernicus were prior to Newton, there was no necessary relationship to either or.

gravity is the curvature of space-time

light gets affected by gravity and it has no mass

Also, to further AstralSentient's point, we know Eratosthenes calculated the Earth's Circumference in 100BCE and was only 66km / 0.16% away from the currently accepted polar circumference

ok what makes objects fall to earth in the globe model its mass attracting mass due to mass

How about, sh*t falls (in a predictable relationship), no theory or explanation needed.

ok but thats not the globe model though

in the globe model objects fall down because mass attracts mass to mass its why the moon orbits earth and the earth orbits the sun its how all the bodies in outerspace were formed. i would say mass attracting mass is critical to the globe model thats all

I don't depend on models, those are abstract, idea based.

eratosthenes calculated the circumfrence then chris colombus goes 2500 miles and thinks he almost circled earth i doubt it

no proof of eratosthenes

plus everyone knows 2 wells or 2 sticks int he ground would work with a flat local sun and a sphere earth with a far sun

Too bad 'flat local sun' is based on nonsensical unverified theory and fails to match reality.

so how did he prove the circumfrence if it would work with a flat earth and local sun

Oh, you brought up models of the flat Earth, wonderful

I just want to know how they manage to break physics

It wouldn't

You know, having a light source projecting through the same fluid, yet not to the same distance

neil degrasse tyson said erathosthenes experiment would work on a flat earth with a local sun u should bring it up with him

He said it wouldn't

he said it would

And that magical straight line down the middle that is the divider between day and night

Nope, he said it doesn't

he absolutely said eratosthenes experiment would work with a flat earth