Message from @Derek Nelson

Discord ID: 580971914588323840


2019-05-23 04:03:28 UTC  

He’s denying Einstein’s notion of gravity, and you’re saying he’s not denying it.

2019-05-23 04:03:38 UTC  

What am I missing?

2019-05-23 04:07:22 UTC  

Yeah his "notion of gravity" but not gravity as a whole. He's the main theorist behind entropic gravity.

2019-05-23 04:08:24 UTC  

You're just picking and choosing what you want to hear.

2019-05-23 04:08:31 UTC  

So you do, or don’t deny Einstein’s notion of gravity?

2019-05-23 04:09:45 UTC  

Nevermind

2019-05-23 04:09:54 UTC  

I'll just stick to the lounge

2019-05-23 04:10:12 UTC  

How about you Derpy?

2019-05-23 04:10:22 UTC  

No you misunderstand completely. Hes saying there is something that does all the things gravity is said to do. Works exactly like gravity is said to work. But it isn't what the people in the past thought it was.

2019-05-23 04:10:24 UTC  

If you're just going to delete what I say there's no point.

2019-05-23 04:10:31 UTC  

The models are all still true.

2019-05-23 04:11:15 UTC  

He’s saying without a shadow of a doubt, he does not agree with Einstein.

2019-05-23 04:11:49 UTC  

Yes. About what Einstein thought gravity *was*. Not what it *did*.

2019-05-23 04:12:24 UTC  

Einstein was wrong about a lot of stuff, my dude.

2019-05-23 04:12:44 UTC  

But his model still works.

2019-05-23 04:13:12 UTC  

Its just the thing that makes it work if different from what he thought.

2019-05-23 04:13:13 UTC  

His model works in THEORY.

2019-05-23 04:13:20 UTC  

That’s it.

2019-05-23 04:13:49 UTC  

I want to go back to if you still think he said that quote you posted.

2019-05-23 04:13:56 UTC  

Because he didn't.

2019-05-23 04:14:58 UTC  

That is what he said. Your belief in gravity is leading you to make absurd excuses where Einstein’s gravity doesn’t work, but gravity still works as a whole where you can’t actually prove it.

2019-05-23 04:15:25 UTC  

Thanks for making that clear.

2019-05-23 04:15:33 UTC  

He also said in the video repeatedly that you can observe *something* doing all the things Einstein said gravity would do. Its just different from what Einstein thought it was.

2019-05-23 04:16:18 UTC  

Also you do know what a quote is, right? Actual words a person said? Not something that agrees with what you think they said?

2019-05-23 04:16:19 UTC  

But we can’t actually measure it, or experiment with it. Got it.

2019-05-23 04:16:39 UTC  

He said like 5 times he's measured it and observed it...

2019-05-23 04:17:07 UTC  

And we can experiment with it ourselves to prove his claims?

2019-05-23 04:17:27 UTC  

What are you expecting exactly? With a powerful enough microscope you'd see tiny little guys pushing things??

2019-05-23 04:17:34 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/538929818834698260/580972569931546644/image0.jpg

2019-05-23 04:17:51 UTC  

Just like they can accurately measure in cosmology. Mhmm.

2019-05-23 04:17:52 UTC  

Sure. Get a job working as researcher and use their equipment.

2019-05-23 04:19:26 UTC  

@Derek Nelson Science makes mistakes. You do realize that what happened there was that everything worked exactly as they predicted but they couldnt observe what was producing the gravity, right?

2019-05-23 04:19:49 UTC  

Like there was MORE of it than they expected?

2019-05-23 04:20:12 UTC  

Well...not exactly that's not true.

2019-05-23 04:20:24 UTC  

No kidding.

2019-05-23 04:20:37 UTC  

Things we're happening like they expected there was just more happening than was expected.

2019-05-23 04:20:50 UTC  

gravity explains everything pretty well. works with our current model of science. in fact, with newton's theory of gravity, we were able to discover the existence of neptune based on the orbit of uranus.

2019-05-23 04:21:34 UTC  

Explains it in theory. But not proven. Stark difference, Bruh.

2019-05-23 04:22:56 UTC  

we were able to detect gravitational radiation from binary pulsars.

2019-05-23 04:23:00 UTC  

When you can make accurate predictions its pretty proven. And when your precautions are innacurate you can correct it without having to modify your base assumptions its also still correct.

2019-05-23 04:23:37 UTC  

What do you mean by ‘we’, bruh?