Explain.

The point being, you’re not pointing out anything that isn’t already supposed to happen on a stationary earth.

Why wouldn’t the guy be able to jump up and down on a moving trampoline on a stationary earth again?

The point being, you’re not pointing out anything that isn’t already supposed to happen on a stationary earth.

https://youtu.be/ssJL17A2EP8

You never made your point.

Plus, you posted that crappy meme that tries to explain the ISS with cartoons, and virtual data.

And that video I posted, is actual verifiable information.

@Derek Nelson `"jelly toaster strudels"`

lol!! 😄 👍

Lol.

He deleted his comment.

That’s rich.

When he was the one who changed the subject.

You were talking to me from another account.

Yeah. It was definitely you, on a different account.

And you deleted them.

Unreal.

So, now that I’ve discovered your ruse. You going to make another account, pretend to be someone else, and still troll me?

I hope you realize lying never pays off.

Apparently your other account was banned.

Hmm. Regardless you’re trolling me with multiple accounts. You changed the subject.

at least we can all agree here that vaccines are good at the end of the day.

!mute @FruitLoops

<:CHECK6:403540120181145611> **FruitLoops#9586** was muted
```
reason: Unspecified
```

You wish it were the same physics.

You can’t say that, when the earth is spinning in an eastward direction, yet you get to say it would work for Every direction anyway. That makes no sense.

Depending what direction a truck is traveling on a ball spinning in one direction? Yeah. It Matters..

So you’re providing an example where the earth isn’t moving at all, and that’s what we are supposed to observe on a stationary earth anyway.

If the earth is moving in an opposite direction beneath him, it will produce a different momentum in that other direction.

Because that is what would actually happen in the scenario of earth moving. It would not land in the same place if the ball is traveling in an opposite direction, because of the gravity mainstream science proposes. It’s what supposedly keeps a helicopter stationary above a rotating earth. According to the theory.

You’re losing me..

On a stationary earth, firing a 50 caliber rifle straight up in a moving truck, and continue to drive, is one test, I would not want to do.

That’s what the coriolis effect would say. The earth spins beneath it.

I didn’t claim to know the math. The video I posted was of a guy who does claim to know and he has gotten zero claimed mathematical rebuttals. Except by you, here in discord.

I already innately know the effect is a hoax. If it were true, it would effect balloons, planes, helicopters, take your pick. But it doesn’t.

Spare me.

You can’t use math to explain away how the effect doesn’t work on those other vehicles I just mentioned.

No, you can’t. Only in the fantasy world of make believe.

The earth’s spin can effect a bullet in fractions of a second, but not a ginormous vehicle even when given 36 hours.

Please understand what I’m saying.