Message from @raspberry
Discord ID: 596848228247535627
Yes and we should be able to get that electron faster than C @Steve Angell
so get to work
Cant remember which of the 2
@Fran relative to an aether? Things can move faster than c in general relativity
Again. All you say depends on the earth being motionless.
Except they can't relative to the local space time or "aether"
@raspberry send link
Are u talking about einsteinrosen bridges
But two galaxies can move apart faster than light
I would havw no trust in a C constant speed measuring machine
Nu just space time expansion
Not faster than local speed of light
relative to the one Galaxy the other has to look like it's moving at C
Whatever value it returned
No Fran
post link dug
The current theory. As you go further out it is all moving faster and faster till eventually faster than C thus those stars can never be seen.
I can when I get home
But it's googlable
There are galaxies that can never be observed supposedly because they move away faster than light
Big bang theory has lots of flaws(really only a few)
C is fake. It is a religious belief. Never proven.
As a religious belief they do not allow you to debunk it. Just like religions.
Its the limit for electron speed
and proton
It has like 2 accepted theories about our universe but realistically there are more
which are attached to neutrons
Based on a motionless earth. Houston we have a problem.
It is limit for elections and all causality
Electron speed. It is based on the earth being motionless. That is a problem.
Except only relative to a local 4d "aether"
When they claim we do not know what 0 velocity is.
Light speed is formally the limit of causality speed yeah
They test electron speed with the basis being the earth is motionless. They they say we are moving super fast through space.
And only relevant if there is a cause
I.e. Why entanglement doesn't count as breaking light speed, ye that sry
0 velocity could be anything given the galaxy, rotation, and suns orbit about in the galaxy; there is really no way we can calculate that;
This is religion. Not real Science.
Steve I'm not claiming it's true, this is just what they claim