it seems like you proved it yourself

When asked they admit it is just a theory and never properly proven.

Newton's law of universal gravitation states that every particle attracts every other particle in the universe with a force which is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between their centers.

There is a new Cavendish device they are working on and perhaps it will be a valid device. I assume it too will fail to prove Mass to Mass attraction and they already know this. Thus they are delaying finishing this device. Seems they give no date at all now as to when it might be set up. The norm for those who want to prove the ball earth but can not do so.

What I get from here is that you used the formula used to prove mass attracts mass and you found it to be accurate

The only part I agree with is gravity is 32'*S^2.

Where'd you get that from

I guess now they are lying Newton said a lot more than when i was in College in 1971.

I mean he's been dead for a while

Don't know why they would alter his laws

Because then they can claim settled science with a lot longer time it was settled.

Seems to me they are always expanding what old men said for the purpose of doing that.

New books come out and claim they have sources that when examined simply do not confirm what they write.

I have seen this so much with Christianity as well. It is not just Science. It seems everyone lies about History in all forms. They change it over time over and over.

Was the law of gravitation formula different back when you first learned about it

Yes back in 1968 or so when I first learned that in High School ninth grade or so.

I loved math and physics from a very young age.

I took it for two years in High School. Physics.

Wait when was it changed and what parts of it were changed

Like I noticed on buildings the date built was on a cornerstone. I then noticed they would remove it and replace it with a older date. Sometimes 20 years older than the original cornerstone.

I just checked my encyclopedia from 1963 and it's still the same formula

F=G(m1*m2/r^2)

I noticed that they never built new buildings for Courthouses and such that looked like the older ones. Those tall columns. When I asked about it i was told they no longer knew how to make those.

The new buildings were nothing close to what the old ones looked like. Just very cheap as I saw it. The old ones had wonderful paintings painted on the walls. The new ones almost never had that. Everything got to looking inferior to the old. Why do that if things are really getting better?

Earth =round

Good school kid.

Steve you're changing the subject again

YEAH STEVE

I noticed the history my kids were learning had many things changed. I read their new history books and they changed year to year in sometimes drastic ways on history.

Steve...

Are we not going to go back to the gravity argument

cause if not I'm just gonna go

What more is there to say. I believe in that single formula. Not at all about a ball earth.

You guys tackled gravity and saying it's the only thing keeping ball earth alive

Without it I can't explain much about globe earth

That single formula is what's keeping this belief alive

No. All I say is if I fall 10 feet i am going to injure myself. Gravity.

Well you'd be able to calculate how fast you would be going due to the law of gravitation and the formula it uses

just like you did with your brother

However if I dive properly I can dive into water from 25 feet. Or at least i used to be able to do that.

Yes. However that would not work at higher elevations than he could dive. Then I would need to calculate how much air resistance he was against.

Skydiving is way different. You get to where you are not going to go faster if you position your body for max air resistance.