Yes 32 feet per second squared in our feet.

His formula was to have mass attract mass be used

I used calculus as taught so I could change this to the three formulas i needed to compute it all.

But you still used his formulas

I thought you guys disproved his theory

and gravity *wasn't* mass attract mass

Newton never claimed it was more than a theory. Einstein claimed it was law.

Are we going to agree that his formula works though

It is not us. You can find many round earth videos where they admit Mass to Mass attraction has never been proven.

newtons stated that that formula was the *law* of gravitation

it seems like you proved it yourself

When asked they admit it is just a theory and never properly proven.

Newton's law of universal gravitation states that every particle attracts every other particle in the universe with a force which is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between their centers.

There is a new Cavendish device they are working on and perhaps it will be a valid device. I assume it too will fail to prove Mass to Mass attraction and they already know this. Thus they are delaying finishing this device. Seems they give no date at all now as to when it might be set up. The norm for those who want to prove the ball earth but can not do so.

What I get from here is that you used the formula used to prove mass attracts mass and you found it to be accurate

The only part I agree with is gravity is 32'*S^2.

Where'd you get that from

I guess now they are lying Newton said a lot more than when i was in College in 1971.

I mean he's been dead for a while

Don't know why they would alter his laws

Because then they can claim settled science with a lot longer time it was settled.

Seems to me they are always expanding what old men said for the purpose of doing that.

New books come out and claim they have sources that when examined simply do not confirm what they write.

I have seen this so much with Christianity as well. It is not just Science. It seems everyone lies about History in all forms. They change it over time over and over.

Was the law of gravitation formula different back when you first learned about it

Yes back in 1968 or so when I first learned that in High School ninth grade or so.

I loved math and physics from a very young age.

I took it for two years in High School. Physics.

Wait when was it changed and what parts of it were changed

Like I noticed on buildings the date built was on a cornerstone. I then noticed they would remove it and replace it with a older date. Sometimes 20 years older than the original cornerstone.

I just checked my encyclopedia from 1963 and it's still the same formula

F=G(m1*m2/r^2)

I noticed that they never built new buildings for Courthouses and such that looked like the older ones. Those tall columns. When I asked about it i was told they no longer knew how to make those.

The new buildings were nothing close to what the old ones looked like. Just very cheap as I saw it. The old ones had wonderful paintings painted on the walls. The new ones almost never had that. Everything got to looking inferior to the old. Why do that if things are really getting better?

Earth =round

Good school kid.

Steve you're changing the subject again

YEAH STEVE

I noticed the history my kids were learning had many things changed. I read their new history books and they changed year to year in sometimes drastic ways on history.

Steve...

Are we not going to go back to the gravity argument

cause if not I'm just gonna go