Message from @thing
Discord ID: 598308028957196328
Yeah i'm not sure undgrad physics will cover advanced stuff like this
if you would tell me where you're studying at that would help
so I could see what your major offers
and what they offer to undergrads research wise
I understand how general relativity and quantum mechanics break down at a fundamental level. But this in no way disproves what we know about the observable universe
Show me it mathematically
Show me how the equations of each respective theory break down
I think that's where our miscommunication lies
@thing I'd stop here if he won't tell me where he goes he is most likely lying about what he knows
You are not disproving gravity at all, you are just trying to stump me with quantum system field equations
He's not trying to explain the concept to you
he's spamming equations and garble that doesn't help anyone
if he cared and knew what he was talking about he would ELI5 for you
At this point he has no credibility on his major or place of study
his expertise is as good as ours right now
How does this conclude to you that the Earth is flat? It's one thing to acknowledge that gravity is not a unifying theory, but to become a FE because of that?
You can find the equations he so called made from simply looking at some Quantum field equations
He isnt disproving gravity
@mineyful 1. Yes they don't cover this but that doesn't mean what I'm saying is wrong. If you disagree feel free to fact check it.
2. Northeastern
northeastern were
you got into a private university and you still doubt that the earth is round?
They are just field equations trying to piece non-applicable theories
@mineyful bud, you can use ad homs and such but if you don't trust my claims fact check
Saying stuff like "he's lying because I don't believe know where he studies" ain't going to make my claims any less valid
@97 Eleven I find this very interesting, how do you believe your "research" concluded you believing in a FE
you in applied physics or just general physics
@thing they aren't any field equations involved here, so I'm not even sure where you're getting this from
You are not answering my question
How is the earth flat from what you described
Maybe what I'm saying doesn't directly equal a flat earth? Ever thought of that?
The entire discussion was on gravity and string theory
how far you in your studies
I've got no clue where you even introduced flat earth from
But you described a fundamental error in quantum physics and general relativity which involved gravity. I can agree on that. Yet, that is in no way conclusive to your original claim of "disproving gravity"
Unless you're somehow under the assumption that because I'm a flat earther everything I must say has to be direct evidence for a flat earth
Well it does play a major role on your argument