If you really want to disprove einstein that bad then go google it for yourself

"Is gravity a force"

From what I gathered, you are saying gravity isn't a force simply because its effects arise only when there are two reference frames.

You'll get an answer similar to mine except simplified I'm guessing

@thing no that's not what I'm saying

by accelerating reference frames do you mean two objects of mass with acceleration?

Just google it

There'll be a better answer in layman's terms

Lol

But can you agree that mass to mass attraction does occur?

From the bend in space time?

Well it was an interesting debate, you obviously know about Einstein's fundamental flaw within Relativity (which any proclaimed physicist should know). I agree on the fact that the full theory of gravity is not as polished as Einstein would've wanted it to be. However, I would like to finally state that this is no way shape or form disproves the acceleration that objects of mass feel in spacetime, That is not disputable. Also, the flaw with quantum mechanics and general relativity is also acknowledged, and until we can unify such theories or come up with a unifying theory both theories are just incomplete. Once again, this does not conclude that gravity is not felt throughout the cosmos. We can observe it, measure it, and predict astronomical events using gravity with extreme precision.

I do not believe things never proven to be true. Mass to Mass attraction has never been proven to be true. Sure they have circus acts at colleges to show the fake test for it which had been disproven when it first was done. Yet the still do it because what else are you to do when you lie your are science yet have no proof. Cavendish is a joke.

I dispute the speed of light. C. Never proven either though not as disproven as Cavendish. Most will not go there. Tesla did but few have the willpower he had.

I see Einstein as a false prophet of a false religion called Science just to deceive. A pastor. Using math to confuse people into believing his false religious teachings.

Aren't you religious?

Yes very much so.

Is that not based on faith?

But not stupid so my belief on religion is based on proof the earth was created by someone I call our Creator. Yehovah sometimes but I make no claim that is the valid name.

In addition I felt the love of God when I nearly died.

Have been helped by God and even spoken to by God on minor things. Do not go there. Stuff like that.

So I would assume you find it annoying when people who have not had the same connection to religion as you deny it?

I love everyone. So no it does not annoy me. I feel sorry for some of them.

Perhaps scientists have their own proofs that you and I can't understand, just like you have your proofs that the scientists don't understand

I totally understand someone believing in the globe and atheist. I have no problem with that. As long as they are not abusive towards me. Then I just try to avoid them.

^

I honestly don't care what anyone believes in, *as long as it is not hurtful or harassing to anyone in any way*

If it doesn't hurt anyone, go ahead

I rarely can not understand the supposed proof they present. I took College Physics. So generally I understand it to some degree.

We see that the same. Just be nice.

exactly

the world would be a lot better

@GreenPixel take your own advise

Would do you good

Same for you bro

I’m here for you

http://theconversation.com/you-dont-need-to-build-a-rocket-to-prove-the-earth-isnt-flat-heres-the-simple-science-88106

Science is satanic

The cult that follows "science" is satanic

What is logically true (science) isnt always "Science"

80% of scientific papers published today aren't science

true science is independent of all the propaganda and labcoats. it is not Satanic, it is Logical - from God. It's the fake science that is Satanic