but it's not lmao

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

literally all pressurized containers have a gradient

1

The pressure gradient would be in any container that is in a gravitational field. It's just that in most situations, the gradient in air is too small to worry about and it is ignored.

You can determine the gradient the same way you do pressure underwater. You just multiply the depth of the fluid by the density. For very large columns, the density of air would vary. But for a small container, we can assume it's nearly constant, around ρ=1.225kg/m3
That means near sea level, if the pressure at the bottom of a container is 1atm or about 1013mbar, the pressure 1m higher would be less by the weight of that amount of air.

ΔP=ρgh
ΔP=(1.225kg/m3)(9.81m/s2)(1m)
ΔP=0.12mbar
1m up in your container, the pressure is less by about 0.01%.

huh

that's actually kinda illuminating

it shows that even with constant density atmosphere, you could get a pressure gradient

imagine having to prove we aren't in a container

Imagine having to prove we are

"second law of thermodynamics!"

I mean actually proving it’s existence

what is this debate about

Wether there is a dome or not

It’s not really a debate at the moment

ok what is your opinion

No existe

ok i guess we have nothing to debate about xd

Lol

If we were in space all the air would be gone

It isn't gone thanks to gravity

@Citizen Z how come?

Entropy

Entropy is the reason we have a pressure gradient

I don’t think you understand entropy citizen

@Citizen Z so because of the dome, we have a constant pressure everywhere on the planet not matter the altitude?

Even with a dome, there'd be a pressure gradient. Atmospheric pressure is caused by weight of the atmosphere, so the higher your altitude, the less pressure would be exerted on you.

buoyancy and density would not explain a pressure gradient.... only one thing would explain that...

Buoyancy requires gravity

shhht they don't know that :P

Here's a great video of a density tower in micro gravity to demonstrate how buoyancy requires gravity:
https://youtu.be/rpP-7dhm9DI?t=175

Elon Musk with child trafficker Ghislane Maxwell

is there a debate to be had regarding this image?

right, so in 2014, when no one knew, he was supposed to know?

And so the plot thickens...

I guess he was silenced by the big evil corp that guards Antarctica :/

Technically buoyancy requires a force that acts on the whole system not gravity. Its just the only other possible forces i couls think of wouls be Fc (centripital force (or centrifugal force one of the 2) which would say we are spinning very fast in a circle. Which is ok i guess. Theres not really anuthing wrong with it

there is though, FE believe the earth is stationary

Most of them yes. But not all of them

The non-religious ones don't find it necessary to incorporate geocentrism.

the non religious ones make less sense because what is their excuse?

Purely distrust in the government, I think.