So what do you think spectators of rocket launchers are?

Actors?

macro evolution is not a fact

Yes it is

We can measure the chemical composition by analyzing absorption and emission lines in spectrographs. So yes, those "lights" are up there

no they really shoot a rocket into the sky

and it goes up then comes back doesn and eventually its too far away for the spectators to see

There are no proofs for any of those teories

So they don't claim to have any evidence for it?

Yes there are @Rudi, just look at fossils

So what do you believe space is

idk

neither does nasa

There is no proof for macro evolution and that we came from a rock

maybe they do know but they arent telling us

macro evolution is a fairy tale for adults

We didn't come from a rock. I'm not sure what you mean by that.

bananas and camel are not related

organic evolution

what did life evolve from

RNA is compatible though

Technically, they are related, but only at the most basic form of life.

rock they say

Life evolved from older life, not from rocks

listen rudi i had a banana tree and one time it grew a camel

The origin of life is irrelevant to evolution

so

Evolution concerns itself with how life changes, not how it originates

Life on earth evolved from the first chemical amoebas that arrived on a meteor

can I see a picture 😃

where did the amoebas evolve from

From older life

ont he meteor

Other planets with life on them

The source is irrelevant to the process of it changing

no the source is relevant

are we talking about evolution lets start at the beginning

You can say god made the first life if you like, it doesn't affect how it changes

It's not that relevant unless you try incredibly hard to deny it, which is wrong

And @BurritoPlanetis correct

have u ever seen a kent hovind debate