the21catToday at 9:24 AM
Yeah but most people find a mix between both belief systems

What about theoretical sciences, sounds like the belief realm to me

You don't just "believe" proved evidence

21cat said its a belief system

21 bad

Theoretical sciences still have to be tested before they get accepted

well what some people think is proof other people think is not proof

pictures of the earth from space is proof to some not proof to others

space is a theory

Opinions don't matter in the context of science though.

Space is a proven fact

not really

i mean yes their is lights and objects above us

Satellites built by amateurs have been put into space

but i dont think anyone or anything has ever been to space

It's considered a theory by people too stubborn to accept that their fantasy isn't true

*imagine thinking we haven't been to space*

people and machiens in space is a fantasy its called sci fi

In that case, religion is a fantasy too

ok

@Rudi What does the mainstream claim is the evidence for the big bang?

Evolution is factual @Rudi. I don't care too much about the others but evolution is factual.

macro evolution or the other evolutions ?

So what do you think spectators of rocket launchers are?

Actors?

macro evolution is not a fact

Yes it is

We can measure the chemical composition by analyzing absorption and emission lines in spectrographs. So yes, those "lights" are up there

no they really shoot a rocket into the sky

and it goes up then comes back doesn and eventually its too far away for the spectators to see

There are no proofs for any of those teories

So they don't claim to have any evidence for it?

Yes there are @Rudi, just look at fossils

So what do you believe space is

idk

neither does nasa

There is no proof for macro evolution and that we came from a rock

maybe they do know but they arent telling us

macro evolution is a fairy tale for adults

We didn't come from a rock. I'm not sure what you mean by that.