Yup.

Is a theory admissible as proof?

Gravity holds our atmosphere in place.

Nope.

It's not a theory.

And there is proof.

Yes, it is a theory. Sorry.

Ever thought of how we stay on the ground?

And therefore not admissible as proof at all.

https://flatearth.ws/c/gravity

READ THIS.

YES IT HAS BEEN SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN TO EXIST YOU ABSOLUTE CRETIN

EVEN THOUGH YOU HAVE GRAVITY YOURSELF I HOPE NOT EVEN A SINGLE PERSON WILL BE ATTRACTED TO YOU. @Derek Nelson

As you measure.

And again, I’m sorry. Gravity has never, ever been proven.

WHAT ABOUT THE BLACK HOLE PICTURE?

<:CHECK6:403540120181145611> @greloom. has been warned
```
reason: Bad word usage
```

OR THE MOON ORBITING THE EARTH

OR THE FRICKING PLANETS ORBITING THE SUN

WHY DON'T WE DRIFT OFF INTO RANDOM DIRECTIONS IF GRAVITY DOESN'T EXIST

ATOMS ARE ATTRACTED TO EACHOTHER BECAUSE OF GRAVITY

BUT I HOPE NO SINGLE ATOM IS ATTRACTED TO YOUR WORTHLESS BEING

<:CHECK6:403540120181145611> @greloom. has been warned
```
reason: Bad word usage
```

BECAUSE PHYSICS YOU ABSOLUTE CRETIN

https://www.space.com/41077-einstein-general-relativity-survives-test.html

:)))))))

THE ISS EXISTS :)))

:)))

:)))

If the theory of relativity were proven, it would cease to be called a theory. But it hasn’t.

Perhaps you boys need to retake basic English.

No thanks.

Yes, theorists love to dress up their theories with words they can’t prove.

hmm

i wonder

```Because somewhere around 1900, the fashion changed, especially in physics. Theory had tended to mean "far-fetched, over-complicated, speculative explanation" and law had tended to mean "well-established regularity, presumptively decreed as a literal law for natural things by God". Suddenly that changed. Scientists kept discovering interesting regularities, but pretty much stopped calling them laws. Conversely, "theory" became the neutral term for a logically structured attempt to explain something.

I don't know for sure, but I speculate this was due to two things: (i) by about 1900, scientists had created a number of large-scale theories that were wildly successful in making substantive and falsifiable predictions, including (retrospectively) Newtonian mechanics, as well as electromagnetism, thermodynamics, the atomic theory in chemistry, evolution, etc, and (ii) geology and evolutionary biology had really deep-sixed the credibility of traditional religion on natural history, so the presumption that scientists were discovering literal laws had come to look a bit unseemly.```

!mute @greloom. Go to the corner until you know how to behave.

<:CHECK6:403540120181145611> **greloom.#5219** was muted
```
reason: Go to the corner until you know how to behave.
```

<:BigSmiles:556070613224259594>